Allowing the appeal of the revenue , the Tribunal held that ; Annual lease premium paid for acquiring mining rights on a land was capital expenditure. Tribunal also held that if the payment is capital in nature, expenditure cannot be allowed on staggered basis. Even for the purpose of spreading over period of lease, it is essential that the expenditure should be in the nature of revenue expenditure. ( AY.2008 -09 to 2012-13)
ACIT v. K.R. Kaviraj. (2018) 168 ITD 491 (Bang) (Trib.)
S.37(1): Business expenditure – Capital or revenue- Annual lease premium paid for acquiring mining rights on a land was capital expenditure.