Allowing the appeal of the Revenue the Court held that The High Court had not considered the conduct of the assessee, which had been considered in detail by the Tribunal, nor the findings of the Tribunal that during search in the case of the assessee and its group concern, duplicate cash book, ledger and other books showing unaccounted manufacturing and trading by the assessee in diamonds were found, that huge additions were made in the case of assessee’s group in the block assessment on the basis thereof and that the assessee was maintaining books of account outside the regular books. The order passed by the Tribunal and the assessment order were restored. Miscellaneous application filed against order of Supreme Court is dismissed on account of delay as also on merits. (AY. 2000-01)
ACIT v. Kantilal Exports Surat (2024) 300 Taxman 99 (SC) Editorial : ACIT v. Kantilal Exports Surat (2023) 293 Taxman 531/ 454 ITR 112 /332 CTR 610/ 225 DTR 357 (SC) M. Kantilal Exports v. ACIT (2011) 330 ITR 185 (Guj)(HC), reversed.
S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Search and seizure-Duplicate account-Yield in various years-Finding reversed relying on statement-Order of Tribunal is restored-Miscellaneous application against the order of Supreme Court is dismissed on account of delay and also on merits. [S. 132, 143(3), Art. 136]
Leave a Reply