Tribunal held that where the interest free funds available with assessee by way of capital and reserves were far more than investment made in shares yielding exempt divided income, a presumption would be in favour of assessee for deemed utilization of interest free funds for investments yielding tax free income in preference to borrowed funds. Tribunal also hed that disallowance of expenditure cannot exceed exempt income. (AY. 2008 09, 2010-11)
Aditya Medisales Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 176 ITD 783 (Ahd.)(Trib.)
S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Interest free funds available-Presumption that interest free funds for investments yielding tax free income in preference to borrowed funds-Disallowance of expenditure cannot exceed exempt income. [R. 8D]