
These judgements are uploaded by our esteemed readers. If you have a judgement on an important topic that you would like to share with others, please use this form to upload it
PCIT v. Jayesh V. Sheth (Bombay High Court)
Bombay High Court: S. 268A : Appeal-Instructions-Circulars-Monetary limits-Revision-Penalty- Concealment penalty-Monetary limit is also applicable to proceedings under section 263 of the Act-The CIT u/s. 263 of the Income-tax Act directed the AO to initiate a penalty for concealment, which was not originally initiated in the assessment order-Tribunal set aside the order of the Commissioner-On appeal as the tax… Read More ...
PCIT v. Buniyad Chemicals Ltd (Bombay High Court)
Bombay High Court: S. 68 : Cash credits – Failure to furnish source , identity of parties and genuineness of transaction -Shell companies - A racket of illegal business of providing accommodation entries -Accommodation entry provider -Credit appearing in the bank account -Books of account -Data appearing in 2 CDs are extracted by the investigating wing from books… Read More ...
Bhavya Construction Co. v. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Mumbai Tribunal : S. 80IB(10) : Housing projects-Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) Projects-CBDT circular-Notification- Claim u/s.80IB (10) would be allowable even the approval was granted before 01/04/2004 and commencement certificate after 01-4-2004-Circulars and notifications cannot override the provisions of the Act.-Notification No. 1/2011 dated 5-1-2011 restricting the eligibility of section 80IB(10) to SRA project on or after 1-4-2004 and… Read More ...
M/s. Top Class Capital Markets Private Limited (ITA 709/Mum/2024) (ITAT Mumbai)
Hon'ble Mumbai ITAT: Hon’ble ITAT noted that the ‘issue as per reasons recorded for reopening’ provided to the assessee and ‘reasons recorded for reopening’ reproduced in the assessment order are different. Few paragraphs quoted in the reasons reproduced in the assessment order was not there in the ‘issues as per reasons recorded for reopening’ provided to the assessee.… Read More ...
GeBBS Healthcare Solutions Private Limited (ITA 5528/Mum/2024) (ITAT Mumbai)
Hon'ble Mumbai ITAT: o Adjustment cannot be made in the intimation issued u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) without giving an opportunity of being heard to the assessee. o Intimation issued u/s 143(1) of the Act gets merged with assessment order passed u/s 143(3) of the Act. If assessment order passed u/s 143(3) of the… Read More ...
Radiant Life Care Pvt Ltd [ITA 5534/Mum/2024] (ITAT Mumbai)
Hon'ble Mumbai ITAT: The word ‘annual’ denotes a period of twelve months. Consequently, in determining the annual average of the monthly averages of investments under Rule 8D(2)(ii), the aggregate must necessarily be divided by the figure of twelve to compute the annual average. The mere fact that the investments existed only for a portion of the year does… Read More ...
Shri Gurpreet Singh Rajput Vs. Income Tax Officer (ITAT Mumbai)
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI “SMC” BENCH : MUMBAI: Ld.CIT(A) was constrained to pass the order ex-parte, since the assessee could not appear before the Ld.CIT(A) for the reasons beyond his control and accordingly prayed that the assessee may be provided with one more opportunity to present his case properly.In the facts of the present case, we find merit in the submissions made by… Read More ...
Suparshva Swabs (I) v. NFAC (Delhi High Court)
Delhi High Court : S. 250: Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure-Delay in disposal-Faceless Appeal-Central Action Plan-Held that the NFAC would endeavour to implement the said remedial measures in all earnest- Writ petition filed seeking time-bound disposal-Direction issued to dispose of appeal within eight weeks. [S.246A, Art.226] The petitioner filed an appeal on 14.10.2022, which remained pending before the Commissioner [CIT(A) for more… Read More ...
CIT v. Nicholas Piramal (India) Ltd (Bombay High Court)
Bombay High Court: S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Community development expenditure-Street lights on the road, ambulance for meeting medical emergencies , developing public garden-The concept of business is not static and over a period of time , it would include within its fold the care and concern for the society at large which would result in a good will… Read More ...
Crystal Pride Developers v. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
Bombay High Court: S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Change of opinion-Internal audit-Failure to dispose of objections-Reopening of assessment based on change of opinion and internal audit objections is without jurisdiction-Notice is quashed. [S. 147, 144B, Art. 226] The petitioner, Crystal Pride Developers, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development, filed its original return for… Read More ...