These judgements are uploaded by our esteemed readers. If you have a judgement on an important topic that you would like to share with others, please use this form to upload it
PCIT, Central-2, Kolkata Vs Settlement Commission (Income-tax & Wealth-tax & anr, (Calcutta HIgh Court)
Calcutta high court: PCIT Central-2, Kolkata Vs Settlement Commission(Income-tax & Wealth-tax & Anr) WPO No 289 of 2017 Forum-Calcutta High Court Date -14th September, 2021 Sub-What are the grounds on which the High court can interfere with the order passed by the Settlement commission in its extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India? In… Read More ...
Harshhvardhan Chhajed v. DGIT (Rajasthan High Court)
Rajasthan High Court : S. 132 : Search and seizure-Seizure of stock in trade-Seizure was held to be illegal-Directed to release the stock in trade and also directed to pay interest of Rs. 1 lakh to the petitioner. [S. 132(4), 132B, Art. 226] The petitioner no. 3 was travelling from Mumbai to Jaipur he was carrying Jewellery and diamond.… Read More ...
Ideacount Education Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Mumbai Tribunal : Coram: Honouarble Mahavir Singh Vice-President, and Honourable M. Balaganesh, AM S. 147 : Reassessment-Change of head-Income from other sources- Share capital-Notice was issued to assess the excess share premium under section 56 of the Act-Addition was made under section 68 of the Act as cash credits-Reassessment is held to be bad in law. [S. 56,… Read More ...
South Indian Bank limited Vs CIT (Supreme Court of India)
Supreme Court of India: South Indian Bank Limited Vs CIT Civil Appeal No 9606 of 2011 Forum-Supreme Court of India Date-9th September, 2021 Sub-Whether proportionate disallowance of interest paid by the banks is called for under Section 14A of Income Tax Act for investments made in tax free bonds/ securities which yield tax free dividend and interest to assessee… Read More ...
Palak Khatuja v. UOI (Chhattishgarh High Court)
Chhattishgarh High Court : S. 148 : Reassessment - Notice - Constitutional Validity - Issued between April 01, 2021 to June 30, 2021 - Without following S. 148A - Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice under section 148 - Taxation and other Law (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 and subsequent notifications - held Constitutionally… Read More ...
ADIT(IT) v. Asia Today Ltd. (Mum.)(Trib.)
Mumbai Tribunal : S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India – DTAA – India - Mauritius - Change of domicile from British Virgin Islands to Mauritius - Entitle to benefits of India-Mauritius DTAA - Dependent agency permanent establishment (DAPE) - As long as an agent is paid an arm's length remuneration for the services… Read More ...
Bennett Coleman & Co. Ltd. v. DCIT (Mum.)(Trib.)
Mumbai Tribunal : S. 92C : Transfer pricing - Arm’s length price - CUP method -Interest-free debt funding of an overseas company in the nature of a special purpose vehicle interest-free debt funding of an overseas company in the nature of a special purpose vehicle - Cannot be compared with loan simpliciter - Cannot be subjected to arm’s… Read More ...
Animish Pradip Raje Vs SEBI (Telangana High Court)
Telangana High Court: *Animish Pradip Raje Vs SEBI* *Writ Petition No 7972 of 2021* *Forum- Telangana High Court* *Sub- Whether appointment of Grant Thornton as forsenic auditor of a company by SEBI was hit by principle of bias when one of the independent directors of the Company was deeply connected with sister concern of Grant Thornton.* In one… Read More ...
Techknoweledgy Interactive Partners P. Ltd. v. ITO (Mum.)(Trib.)
Mumbai Tribunal : S. 254(2) : Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Ex-parte order was passed 30-3-2010-Order was not served on the assesse-The assessee came to know the passing of order on the issue of TRO notice dated 21-1-2020-The order was down loaded from the Official website of the ITAT and Miscellaneous application was filed within six… Read More ...
M/s. Arjun Transport Company Pvt Ltd vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT, Mumbai: When a case is selected for "limited scrutiny" to verify the disallowance made u/s 14A of the Act and AO makes disallowance u/s 14A in the assessment order passed u/s 143 of the Act then the CIT(A) cannot travel beyond the issue selected under ‘limited scrutiny’ and makes disallowance u/s 36(1)(iii) of the Act while… Read More ...