Join our Telegram Channel
These judgements are uploaded by our esteemed readers. If you have a judgement on an important topic that you would like to share with others, please use this form to upload it

VIRENDER KUMAR VS ITO 1(1) ALWAR ITA NO 1100/JP/2019

ITAT JAIPUR: WHEN SOURCE OF CASH DEPOSIT IS INCLUDED IN TURNOVER OFFERED FOR TAX IN RETURN OF INCOME FILED U/S 44AD, NO ADDITION IS VALID Read More ...

AMIT KUMAR DEY VS DCIT (ITA NO 5526/DEL/2018)

ITAT DELHI : Enhancement made by the CIT (Appeals) on issues, which were not part of limited scrutiny invalid and in violation to CBDT Instructions . Read More ...

ITO VS MOMENTUM TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD (ITA NO 5802/DEL/2017)

ITAT DELHI : NO REOPENING VALID WHEN TIME LIMIT FOR SCRUTINY PENDING FROM REVISED RETURN FILED UNDER SECTION 139(5) Read More ...

Reserve Bank of India Vs Jindal STeel and Power Limited

Delhi High court : Power of RBI to withhold remittance to be made under Automatic route to Wholly owned Subsidiary- cannot be used to reject the remittance on whimsical and arbitrary reasons Court- Delhi High court Date -26th March 2021 Citation-Reserve Bank of India Vs Jindal STeel and Power Limited. In this era of globalisation where the global trade… Read More ...

Sinfonia Tradelink Pvt ltd Vs ITO

Delhi High court : Glaring mistakes in reasons recorded in writing, Approval u/s 151 also improper- Delhi High court quashes notice u/s 148 ignoring plea of alternative remedy. Citation-Synfonia Tradelinks Private limited Vs ITO Court- Delhi High court Date-26th March 2021 In a case where there was complete non application of mind not only in the way reasons were… Read More ...

ACIT Vs KUBER KHADAYAN

ITAT DELHI : After distinguishing the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court rendered in the case of B.Kishore 273 CTR 0468(Mad) affirmed by Apex Court. Hon'ble Bench of ITAT has held a) statement recorded u/s 132(4) alone cannot be termed as incriminating material it should have nexus with incriminating material b) No assessment can be framed on the basis… Read More ...

Macrotech Developers Limited Vs Principal Commissioner of Income-tax

Bombay High Court : Whether tax arrears relatable to a company which has been merged with another company can be settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 even though prosecution has been launched on a different issue in the case of the amalgamated company. Forum-Bombay High Court Date- 25th March 2021 Citation-Macrotech Developers Limited The Bombay high court… Read More ...

NRA Iron & Steel Pvt ltd Vs Income-tax Department & Ors

Delhi High court : Whether review petition pending before Supreme Court against a judgement of Supreme Court itself can be considered as pending appeal in terms of Section 2(1)(a) of the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020? Forum- Delhi High Court Date-19-03-2021 Citation-NRA Iron & Steel Pvt ltd Vs Income-tax department & Ors The Delhi High court recently considered the… Read More ...

Collector of Stamp & Ors Vs Tulsi Rice and Pulse Mills

Gujarat High Court : Assignment of Interest in Leasehold land owned by the Partnership by one partner to another -whether amounts to transfer liable for payment of stamp duty under the Indian Stamp Act. Forum-Gujarat High Court Date-22/03/2021 Citation-Collector of Stamp & Ors Vs Tulsi Rice & Pulse Mill The Gujarat high court in this case was called upon… Read More ...

Ritu Sharma

ITAT Delhi : If the materiel on the basis of which reasons were recorded and belief has been entertained is already reversed by the High Court then such an action of 147 is not tenable in law. Read More ...