Answers to queries on Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
The Union Honourable Finance Minister, Mrs Nirmala Sitharaman during her budget speech on February 1, 2020 (2020) 420 ITR 115 (St) (146) proposed to introduce a scheme at para 126 of the speech for settlement of disputes. Subsequently, the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (VSV Act) was introduced. The Scheme was extended from time to time and the last date for payment under the VSV Act, 2020 extended until October 31, 2021 by CBDT, vide Notification No. 75 of 2021 dated June 25, 2021 (2021) 435 ITR (St) 25. The said scheme has benefited the taxpayers to reduce the tax litigation. When the scheme was introduced the research team of the itatonline.org had anticipated that the taxpayers may require a number of clarifications. Itatonline.org had requested the panel of experts consisting of Dr. K. Shivaram Senior Advocate, CA Rajan Vora and CA Pradeep Kapasi to answer queries arising on Vivad Se Viswas Schme to assist the tax consultants and tax payers. The expert panel started answering the queries raised by the tax consultants on February 28, 2020 and till date the expert panel have answered more than 750 questions only on the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020. From May 15, 2021 on words the itatonline.org has introduced the new section on “Ask your questions” which answers questions regularly. It is proposed that this new panel will answer the questions pertaining to Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020.
See also Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme: The Law, Procedure And Dilemma where a link to all necessary resources is given

This section is now closed. Please ask your questions at our new Q&A section
The answers given below are in response to queries asked by other people.
Query

The Assessment order received for AY 13-14, revises the Total Income to Rs -8706142 from -14499445; after adding 2 incomes under sec 69C to the return filed by the assessee. A notice of demand is also received showing outstanding tax to be paid on those 2 incomes. An appeal has already been filed against the same. Kindly suggest as to what can be done regarding this notice under Vivad se vishwas scheme in form 1. Will the additional tax be payable even though the Total Income is -ve as per order?

Answer As per Rule 9 of VSV Rules, 2020, i.e. Manner of computing disputed tax in cases where loss or unabsorbed depreciation is reduced. Where the dispute in relation to an assessment year relates to reduction in loss or unabsorbed depreciation to be carried forward under the Income-tax Act, the declarant shall have an option to –… (read more)
Query

Form 1 & 2 has been filed after giving effect to the rectification order passed by the AO. However, in the said Form we could not find any column to the mention the details as per the rectification order. But the designated authority did not consider the rectification order and determine the amount payable under DTVSV as per the original assessment order u/s 143(3) and thus issued the Form 3. Kindly, advice what is required to do this context.

Answer Make an rectification before the designated authority to rectify the mistake . The assessee can also file revised form . In case the Designated authority does not rectify the assessee can file  a writ before the High Court (read more)
Query

Assessment Order for AY 2013-14 u/s.143(3) dt. 29-02-2016 passed after making addition of Rs.55,53,560/- to the returned income of Rs.1,86,000/-.

Honb’le ITAT vide order pronounced on 31-01-2020 has set aside the matter back to the AO. AO has not started the assessment proceeding till date.

Whether the assessee is ellligible under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme?

Answer The assessee may  not eligible for VSVA as there is no appeal pending on the specified date.  However as the period of filing an appeal before High court  was not over , one may contend that the provision as deemed appeal , hence it can be tried by filing an application before the competent authority . Please… (read more)
Query

Addition of Rs. 15 lakhs were made vide order u/s. 143(3) dt. 03-03-2014 in case of Pvt. Ltd. Co. The Hon’ble CIT(A) has deleted addition of Rs. 3 Lakhs and Hon’ble ITAT has further deleted addition of Rs. 2 Lakhs. The company has not filed further appeal against remaining quantum of Rs. 10 lakhs and paid the taxes.
Meanwhile AO has levied penalty on addition of Rs. 15 lakhs vide order u/s. 271(1)(c) Dt. 23-03-2017. The company filed an appeal against order u/s. 271(1)(c) before Hon’ble CIT(A) on 25-04-2017. The appeal is still pending before Hon’ble CIT(A).
The company after receipt of order of the Hon’ble ITAT in quantum appeal has requested AO to rectify quantum subjected to penalty from Rs. 15 lakhs to Rs. 10 Lakhs.
The company want to opt for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme
Whether the company has to pay 25% of penalty on Rs. 15 lakhs or Rs. 10 Lakhs?

Answer Make an application for giving effect to the order of the Tribunal . The company has to pay 25% of 10 lakhs and not on 15 Lalkhs  . If the AO is not giving effect to the order of the Tribunal , appropriate legal remedy can be taken including filing of Writ before the High… (read more)
Query

If by any reason the process of verification of Form 4 is failed or say if later it comes to knowledge that there was a technical error is filling VSV form. However if the assesee has made the payment of taxes by that time. My question is whether the said payment of tax will be refundable/ adjustable or it will be no refundable/adjustable at all if the VSV process becomes invalid due to some technical reason

Answer As per section 7 of VSVA, any amount paid in pursuance of a declaration made under section 4 of VSVA shall not be refundable under any circumstances. Therefore, it is advisable to rectify Form 4 and contact your designated Authority under VSVA .In case no response is received  by the assessee  from the designated authority… (read more)
Query

A -ve return had been filed by the assessee for AY 2010-2011 having carry forward loss. The assessee received an order, disallowing all expenses claimed in the CY as well as PY b/f losses, and also to pay tax on 8% of gross receipts. A CIT appeal had been filed against the tax on profits(taken by AO as 8% of gross receipts) and the disallowance of brought forward losses of PGBP. The same was partly allowed ( B/F loss allowed). After allowing of the same, the tax on Total Income becomes -ve.
Hence, an ITAT appeal was filed in order to claim the entire CY loss, the same pending as on 31/1/2020.
Kindly guide as to whether Schedule D or A will be filed for the same. and

Answer  If the assessee   desires to settle the issue , the assessee may have to pay the tax in dispute after considering the appeal effect of the order of the CIT (A) .  Choice is with the assessee whether he desires to file as per schedule D or A. It may have to be decided considering… (read more)
Query

1) CIT Appeal filed against quantum order for Tax & Interest.
2) Notice issued u/s. 274 for penalty u/s. 271(1)(c), received and assesse requested to assessing officer to keep the same in abeyance till disposal of CIT Appeal.
3) Said penalty kept in abeyance till final disposal of quantum appeal by Assessing Officer and Penalty Order from Assessing Officer Not Received till filing under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
4) If quantum appeal applied under Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, at later date/ after payment of quantum, penalty is payable or same covered under Vivad se Vishwas Scheme?

Answer As per Question No. 8 of CBDT Circular No. 9 of 2020 dated April 22, 2020, if both quantum appeal covering disputed tax and appeal against penalty levied on such disputed tax for an assessment year are pending, the declarant is required to file a declaration form covering both disputed tax appeal and penalty appeal. However, he… (read more)
Query

Respected Sir,

Assessee died on 24.07.2016. After his death, his PAN has been deactivated. He has two sons. Legal heir tried numerous times to ‘Register as Representative’ in e-filing portal of Income Tax Department but the same was rejected due to requirement of ‘Legal Heir Proof’. The assessee died in Bali, Indonesia and therefore the representative is facing difficulties in obtaining legal heir proof from appropriate authorities. Due to this reason only, appeal was also filed by legal heir in physical form instead of electronic form. Legal heir of assessee wants to opt for Vivaad se Vishwas Scheme which can be filed electronically only. Since the PAN of assessee does not exist and we are unable to register any representative in e-filing portal, what remedy/options are available in such cases, to file declaration under the scheme.

Answer As we understand, the Department requires proof of being a legal heir. First, it would be advisable to submit such proof available with the legal heir before the concerned AO and designated authority.          It is advisable to approach the designated authority . In case designated authority  is not accepting the declaration,  the assessee  can … (read more)
Query

Respected Sir,
My father Late SS Pandey died in the year 2006 and had recovery disputed matter from the assessment year 1986-1992. This case is pending in tribunal court,Indore. As per income tax recovery notice I am legal heir. Kindly suggest how can I apply for vivad se vishwas scheme and get benefit from it.

Answer Yes  , the legal heir can file the declaration   however the tax has to be paid on the disputed amount , the interest will be waived . The Form can be filled and at the time of verification of the Form, your capacity can be disclosed. In the event of any hardship it is advisable… (read more)
Query

If the Assessing Officer fails to rectify error apparent on record, whether a writ can be preferred on the premise that no alternate efficacious remedy is available and the assessee will not be able to file VSVS application if rectification is not permitted.

What would be the answer in case, the rectification is summarily disposed off

Answer An appeal is pending before CIT(A), however, the AO did not rectify a mistake apparent on record. As per FAQ 25 of CBDT Circular No. 9 of 2020 dated April 22, 2020, where the rectification order passed by the AO may have an impact on determination of disputed tax, if there is reduction or increase in the… (read more)