Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


Dy.CIT v .Hard castle Restaurant Pvt Ltd ( Mum)( Trib) www.itatonline .org .

S. 153A: Assessment – Search – Abated assessment – No incriminating material was found – Alleged bogus purchases –Addition was deleted . [ S. 69C , 132 ]

Pradeep Jeyavelu v. ITO (SMC) (Chennai) ( Trib) (UR) www.itatonline .org .

S. 64 : Clubbing of income – Minor child – Capital gains – Sale of inherited property – Minor daughter’s share deposited in nationalized bank under Court order – Not includible in assessee’s hands.[S. 45, 54F , Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, S.8(2) ]

Natesan Ekambaram v. DCIT (Chennai) ( Trib) www.itatonline .org .

S. 54F : Capital gains- Investment in a residential house – Advance received cannot be assessed as capital gains – The AO was directed to recompute the capital gains on actual consideration and also directed to allow the exemption under section. 54F . [S. 45 ]

Shilpa Shetty Kundra v. DCIT (2025) 212 ITD 173 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 272A : Penalty-Failure to answer questions-Sign statements-Furnish information-Non-compliance of notices issued under section 142(1)-Assessment order was passed under section 143(3)-Penalty deleted. [S. 142(1), 272A(1)(d)]

Himasagar Krishna Muthappagari v. ITO (2025) 212 ITD 292 (Hyd)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Revision-Capital gains-Exemption u/s 54F-Failure of AO to verify claim-Revision upheld. [S. 54F, 147]

Gujarat Metal Cast Industries (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT (2025) 212 ITD 178 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Scientific research expenditure-Weighted deduction-Allowed deduction under section 35(2AB) at 200 per cent-Allowable 150 per cent-Revision order is affirmed. [S. 35(2AB, Rule 6]

Suzuki Motor Gujarat (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT (2025) 212 ITD 49 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Additional depreciation-At rate of 10 per cent on ‘plant and machinery’ put to use for a period of less than 180 days during preceding year-No error-Revision order is set aside. [S. 32(1)(ii), 43(6)]

Om Prakash v. PCIT (2025) 212 ITD 437 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Revision-Capital gains-Interest on enhanced compensation-AO’s acceptance of exemption erroneous-Interest taxable [S. 10(37), 56(2)(viii), 145B(1), Land Acquisition Act, 1894, S. 28]

Mining Officer. v. DCIT (TDS) (2025) 212 ITD 93 (Raipur) (Trib.)

S. 206C : Collection at source-Illegal miners-transporters etc-Liable collect TCS-Order of CIT(A) is affirmed. [S. 206C(IC), 206(6). 206(7)]

Jamshed R Bilimoria. v. ITO (2025) 212 ITD 101 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 199 : Deduction at source-Credit for tax deducted-Trust-Sole beneficiary-Reflected in Form No. 26AS of trust-Assessing Officer is directed to take necessary steps to address request of both assessee and trust for transfer of TDS credit from Form No. 26AS of trust to Form No. 26AS of assessee and, thereafter, to allow credit in accordance with law. [Form 26AS]