Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
S. 22 :Professional and other misconduct – Recommendations made by Council were not supported by independent reasons and High Court had accepted recommendations of Council without applying its own logic to this aspect of matter, matter was to be remanded to Council to reconsider matter afresh after granting appellant an opportunity of being heard [ S. 21 ]
S. 147 : Reassessment –With in four years-Change of opinion – Payment to related parties – Incentives to senior employees – Difference in VAT return and Turnover as per profit and loss account -Reconciliation – Questions asked in the course of original assessment proceedings – No discussion in the assessment order – Reassessment notice was quashed. [ S. 40A(2)(b) , 148 , Art , 226 ]
S. 88 : Tax arrear-Amount payable-Adjustment of refund was made as per request of the assessee-Not disclosed the truth and suppressed the communication-Writ petition was dismissed. [S. 245, Art. 226]
S. 184 : Charge of tax and surcharge-Payment of tax-Credit for advance tax-Credit for advance tax must be given-Directed the respondents to issue certificate as required by Rule 4(5). [S. 183, 185 IT ACT, S. 139, 199, 210, 219, Art. 226]
S. 9(c) : Act not to apply in certain cases-Disqualification of persons under prosecution-Named in charge sheet and first information report-Denial of benefit is held too be valid. [Indian Penal Code, 1860, S 120B, 420, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, S. 131(1)(d), 132(2), Art. 226]
S. 4 : Filing of declaration and particulars to be furnished-Pendency of appeal-Condonation of delay-Appeal admitted prior to January 2020-Appeal pending-Directed the respondent to process the declaration. [S. 2(1)(a), Art. 226]
S. 2(f) : Disputed tax-Amount payable by declarant-Interest-Interest granted under section 244A cannot be recovered by revenue authority under Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, by adding same to amount of disputed tax payable by assessee. [S. 3, IT ACT, S. 234D, 244A, Art. 226]
S. 2(1)(a)(ii) : Appellant-Locus standi-Rejection of application on the ground that there is no clarity of Legal Heirs-Appeal was filed beyond limitation period-Rejection of application was held to be not valid-Directed the Designated Authority to accept the declaration [S. 3, 4(1), IT Act, S. 132, Art. 226]
S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Interest receipt was shown as capital receipt-Commissioner refusing to follow the order of Tribunal and dismissing the revision application-Order of Tribunal is binding on the Commissioner-Order of Commissioner was quashed-If any judgements to be relied the Commissioner should give an opportunity to the petitioner to deal with those judgements-Matter remanded. [S. 4, Art.226]
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Exempt income-Strategic investment-View taken by Assessing Officer being a possible view could not have been interfered by Commissioner-Order of Tribunal quashing the revision was affirmed. [S. 14A, R. 8D, 260A]