S. 254(2A): Appellate Tribunal –Stay- ITAT has power to grant stay only if the asseessee pays 20 % of the tax in dispute or furnishes equal amount of security of like amount [ S. 220(6) , 253, 254(1)]
S. 254(2A): Appellate Tribunal –Stay- ITAT has power to grant stay only if the asseessee pays 20 % of the tax in dispute or furnishes equal amount of security of like amount [ S. 220(6) , 253, 254(1)]
Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017
S. 107: Appeals to Appellate Authority – Powers of Revisional Authority – Limitation – Electronic filing of appeals – Orders received physically -Orders were not uploaded – Limitation period would start when order is uploaded on GST portal and not when order is received physically [ S. 108 Art, 226 ]
Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017
S.79:Recovery of tax – Order passed relying on material which was supplied to violates principle of natural justice – Matter remanded back for fresh adjudication after furnishing material relied upon and after giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner .[ Art, 226 ]
Central Goods and Service Tax Act , 2007 ( CGST)
S. 29: Cancellation or suspension of registration- Show cause notice – Adjudication order vague – Cancellation of Registration was not sustainable – Stricture against Department – Adjudication order was quashed – Court observed that it was beyond under standing of Court as to why its officers were not ready to understand and improve .[ Art , 226 ]
Harassment by Department – Unnecessary SLP – Respondent suffering from Cancer – Cost of Rs 1,00,000 was imposed on the Officer to be recovered from his salary .
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Claim of set off of non speculative business loss against the profit of speculated business-Revision order is quashed. [passed by the PCIT u/s. 263 of the Act is quashed. [S. 28 (i), 72, 73]
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-When valid and lawful agreement is entered by the parties prior to 1 April 2014 but the property was registered after said date, provisions of the amended section 56(2)(vii)(b) would be inoperative and therefore an assessment order passed after due consideration of all facts but without invoking the provisions of the amended section 56(2)(vii)(b) cannot be said to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue.
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Bogus accommodation entries-Revision on the basis of roving enquiries-CBDT circular on no set-off of loss against deemed income u/s 115BBE applicable w.e.f. 1st April 2017-Invocation of section 263 jurisdiction by the Ld. CIT is invalid-Income assessed remains same even pursuant to revision-Revision is not valid. [S. 56, 68, 115BBE, 143(3)]
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to Revenue-AO failure to verify the genuineness of the lenders-Complete details not submitted by the assessee-Revision justified. [S. 133(6), 143(3), 147, 148]
S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Monetary limits-Circular specifying monetary limits for the department is retrospective in nature-the circular applies to already pending as well as new appeals. [S. 253(4)]