S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Educational institution-Additional evidence admitted-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer for re-examination. [S. 2(15), 10(23C)(iiiab)]
S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Educational institution-Additional evidence admitted-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer for re-examination. [S. 2(15), 10(23C)(iiiab)]
S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Holding exhibition-Trust having surplus in one year did not change character of trust to business or profit making entity-Entitle to exemption. [S. 2(15)]
S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Non filing of audit report online-The requirement is directory not mandatory-exemption u/s. 11 is allowed. [S. 12A, 154, Form No. 10B]
S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Voluntary contributions-Transaction with related party at arm’s length-Exemption cannot be denied. [S. 2(15), 12, 13(2)(g)]
S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-No Permanent Establishment during relevant assessment year for activities relating from which Assessee had earned revenue-could not be taxed as business profit carried out through PE in India-Appeal Allowed-DTAA-India-Spain. [S. 90, Art. 13(4)]
S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Indian representative office and the bank itself are one unit-They are taxed only once-DTAA-India-German. [S. 2(31), 253, Art.7, 11]
S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Shipping business-Invocation of article 24 of India-Singapore DTAA not justified-Exemption under article 8 is allowed-DTAA-India-Singapore. [S. 44B, 172, Art. 8, 24, Singapore Income-tax Act, S 13F]
S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Explanation 7 to section 9(1)(i) has a retrospective effect-Sale proceeds of shares of foreign company which held investment in India is not taxable. [S. 5]
Constitution of India
Art. 224A: Appointment of retired judges at sittings of High Courts – Appointment of Ad hoc Judges – To clear backlog of cases pending in High Courts crossed 57 lakhs with ratio of vacancies of 40% – General guidelines to excise power in transparent manner .
Consumer Protection Act , 2019
S. 101 :Power of Central Government to make rules -Appointment of Judicial Members -Adjudicating Members – State Consumer Commission-District Consumer Forums- Tribunals-Appointment Process, Minimum experience- 20 years for appointment of President and 15 years for members of state Commission- Unconstitutional and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India- Advocate with 10 years of experience at the Bar eligible for appointment as Members in Tribunals- Rules-Struck down -[ Consumer Protection Rules, 2020, Rule 6 3(2)(b), 4(2)(c), 6(9), Art , 14 ]