Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


Panchanan Dhara & Ors. v. Monmatha Nath Maity (Dead) through LRs. & Anr. 2006 (5) SCC 340/AIR 2006 SC 2281/MANU/SC/2287/2006

Companies Act, 1956.
.S.46: Binding effect of deed executed by directors on behalf of company – Company is held liable and not the Director.-Plea of limitation which was raised for the first time was not allowed to be raised on the facts of the case . [Companies Act, 1956, S.48, Limitation Act, 1963, Art. 54, Indian Contract Act, 1872, S. 29]

Dr. Rini Johar & Another v. State of M.P. & Ors. AIR 2016 SC 2679/(2016) 11 SCC 703/MANU/SC/0667/2016

Code of Criminal Procedure,1973
S.41: Arrest – Procedure to be followed by Police Officer if situation/circumstance is covered u/s 41 and 41A of the Cr.P.C., i.e., where the maximum sentence for such a crime would not exceed 7 years and where proper reasoning for the arrest is required.[Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, S.41A Constitution of India , Art , 32 ]

Council of ICAI v. Gurvinder Singh (2018) 259 Taxman 311 (SC)/(2019) SC 11 785; www.itatonline.org

Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
S.22: Professional misconduct – A Chartered Accountant can be held guilty of professional misconduct even when he is acting as an individual in commercial dealings and is not acting as a Chartered Accountant nor discharging any function in relation to his practice as a Chartered Accountant. Under the Chartered Accountants Act, any action which brings disrepute to the profession or the Institute is misconduct whether or not related to professional work. [Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, S.21(3)]

P. Leelavathi (D) (Smt.) by LR v. V. Shankarnarayana Rao (D) by LRs MANU/ SC/0497/2019/2019 SCC OnLine SC 489

Benami Transactions (Prohibition of Right to Recover Property) Ordinance, 1988.
S.2: A mere financial assistance to purchase immovable property cannot be treated as Benami Transaction.

Ram Chander Talwar v. Devender Kumar Talwar (2010) 10 SCC 671/159 Comp. Cas. 646/MANU/SC/0833/2010

Banking Regulation Act,1949
S.45ZA(2): Nomination for payment of depositor’s money – Nominee rights – Bank Account – Rule of Succession – Death of Depositor- Nominee will have all the rights of the depositor, so far as the depositor’s account is concerned, however, does not make him owner of the money lying in said account – Distribution of money will depend on rules of succession governing the deceased. [Government Saving Certificates Act, 1961, S.6(1)]

Sundaram Finance Limited v. Abdul Samad 2018 (2) SCALE 467/MANU/SC

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
S.36: Execution of awards – Anywhere in the country – No requirement for obtaining a transfer of the decree from the Court which would have jurisdiction over the arbitral proceedings. [Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, S.36, 40; Civil Procedure Code, 1908, S.46]

Himalayan Cooperative Group Housing Society v. Balwan Singh (2015) 7 SCC 373/AIR 2015 SC 2867

Advocates Act , 1961
S.33: – Bar Council of India – Counsel needs express authority to enter settlement/compromise – Admission by counsel – Client is not bound by the statement or admission. [ Bar Council of India Rules , 1975 , Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, S.151, Order III Rule 1, Constitution of India 1950 Art. 226, 227]

State of West Bengal and v. Calcutta Club Ltd. AIR 2019 SC 310/(2019) 311 CTR 121 (SC)/(2019) 76 GST 614 (SC)

West Bengal Sales Tax Act 1994
S. 2(5):Business – Provision of food, drinks and refreshments etc. to permanent members of an incorporated club-not a “deemed sale”-Payment by members to the club not a consideration-club even if incorporated is merely an agent of the members who facilitates the supply of the goods-principle of mutuality applicable even after 46th amendment to Constitution. [ S. 2(10), 2(30), Constitution of India , Art . 366(29A) (e ) , Finance (No. 2 Act , 1994 , S. 65(25a), 65(105) ,66 , Income -tax Act , 1961 , 2 (24) 44, Sale of Goods Act , 1930 , S. 1(1) ]

Godfrey Phillips v. State of UP (2005) 2 SCC 515/AIR 2005 SC 103/(2005) 194 CTR 257 (SC)

Uttar Pradesh Tax on Luxurious Act , 1955
S.3: Levy of Luxury tax- Entry 62 List II: “taxes on luxuries…” – Cannot include “goods” even if they are “luxury goods” which are covered by Entry 54 List II – No overlapping in taxing entries of Seventh Schedule [ Central Sales Tax Act , 1956 , S 14 , 15, Constitution of India , Art 286 ]

Dhampur Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Trade Tax, U.P. (2006) 5 SCC 624/(2006) 147 STC 57 (SC)

Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948
S. 2(h): Sale- Section 2(h), U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 after amendment in consonance with Art. 366(29-A) of the Constitution – Concept of “barter” and “exchange” explained – Since in terms of the Act the manufacturer is a dealer, held, it could not be said that the supply of molasses is the present case was a mode of payment of licence fee [Constitution of India, Article 246, 366(29-A) and Schedule VII List II Entry 54]