Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


Talwar Bro. (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 178 ITD 818 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax–Mesne profit–Arbitral award-damages from tenant for unauthorized occupation of let out property, amount so received being in nature of ‘mesne profit’ was a capital receipt, not liable to tax. [S. 22]

ACIT v. Ginni Global (P.) Ltd. (2019) 178 ITD 693 (Jaipur) (Trib.)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax–Capital or revenue-Income from sale of Carbon emission reduction certificates is capital receipt. [S.80IA, 115BBG]

G.G. Oils & Fats (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 178 ITD 573/ ( 2020) 190 DTR 319/203 TTJ 698 (Asr.)(Trib.)

S. 2(22)(e) : Deemed dividend-Repayment of loan or advance, which gets deemed, on receipt, on account of legal fiction, as a distribution of profit and, thus, as income in hands of payee shareholder, is of no consequence. [S. 10(34), 2(24)(iii), 56]

PCIT v. State Bank of India ( 2019) 181 DTR 275 / ( 2020) 420 ITR 376/314 CTR 542 (Bom)(HC),www.itatonline.org

S. 80M : Inter corporate dividends – Deduction to be on gross income and not on net income. [ S.80HHC ]

P. P. Mahatme, Power of Attorney Holder.v. ACIT (2020) 420 ITR 71/ 268 Taxman 186/ 186 DTR 260/ 313 CTR 147 (Bom) (HC) Editorial: SLP is dismissed , P.P. Mahatme v. ACIT ( 2021 ) 281 Taxman 215 ( SC)

S.147: Reassessment – After the expiry of four years- Limitation — Family settlement – Notice for assessment year 1999-2000 Notice issued to Power of Attorney holder within six Years —Held not barred by limitation -Reassessment is held to be valid – Dispute settled and consent decree passed – No family settlement – Consideration is held to be taxable as capital gains .[ S.45 ,148,163 ]

State Bank of India v. PCIT (2019) 179 ITD 764/ ( 2020) 185 DTR 17 / 203 TTJ 275 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue– Bad debt-Provision for bad debt in books and debit to profit and loss account–Entitle to deduction-Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 36(1)(vii), 36(2)(v)]

Champalal Raj Kumar Textile (P.) Ltd. v. TRO (2019) 179 ITD 791 /(2020) 188 DTR 353 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 254(2) : Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record–Failure to consider an argument advanced by either party to arrive conclusion is not an error apparent on record though it may be error of judgement. [S. 144]

Tata Power Co. Ltd. v. ITO (IT) (2019) 179 ITD 779 / (2020) 187 DTR 25/ 204 TTJ 107 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 201 : Deduction at source-Failure to deduct or pay–Non–residents-Limitation period prescribed in sub-section (3) of section 201 would be equally applicable in respect of non-residents-Order held to be in valid.[S. 40(a)(ia), 195, 201(3)]

Gulab Badgujar (HUF)) v. ITO (2019) 179 ITD 807 (Pune) (Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment–Notice–Assessment order passed without issue of mandatory notice u/s.143(2) of the Act is bad in law. [S.143(2), 148, 292B].

Surendranagar District Co-op. Milk Producers Union Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 75 ITR 339 / 179 ITD 690 (Rajkot.)(Trib.)

S. 80P : Co-operative societies–Supply of milk to mother diary– Deduction u/s.80P(2)(b) is allowable-Interest earned by it from deposits made with nationalised/private banks, however, said benefit was available in respect of interest earned on deposits made with co-operative bank. [S. 80P(2)(b), 80P(2)(d)]