Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


TIG India Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 184 DTR 349 / (2020) / ( 2020) 421 ITR 418 / 312 CTR 199/ 269 Taxman 295 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 201 : Deduction at source-Failure to deduct or pay – Natural justice violated-The order of revenue must speak for itself and cannot be improved upon by an affidavit-in-reply filed by assessee, its not permitted-Orders of revenue were set aside—Matter restored to revenue for fresh disposal of show cause notice after following principles of natural justice i.e. due consideration of assessee submission by speaking order [S. 40(a)(ia), 194C, 194J, 197, 201(1), 201 (IA), Art.226 ]

PCIT v. Tata Communications Ltd. (2019) 267 Taxman 498 / 111 taxmann.com 258 (SC) Editorial: SLP of revenue is dismissed ; PCIT v. Tata Communications Ltd. (2019) 267 Taxman 497 (SC)// (2019) 417 ITR 58 (St.)(SC)

S. 199 : Deduction at source-Credit for tax deducted–Mismatch of TDS figures-Failure of deductor to upload the correct details in form No 26A-Benefit of tax deducted at source should be given to the assessee on the basis of evidence produced before the revenue authorities. [S. 205, Form 26A]

CIT v. Jet Airways India Ltd. (2019) 180 DTR 115/ ( 2020) 420 ITR 389 / 314 CTR 500(Bom.)(HC)

S. 194H : Deduction at source–Commission or brokerage-Bank credit card payment–Not liable to deduct tax at source–Lounce charges are covered u/s. 194C and not u/s. 194I of the Act [ S.40(a)(ia), 194I]

Gauravbhai Hargovindhai v. TRO (2019) 419 ITR 227 / 267 Taxman 305/(2020) 188 DTR 68/ 316 CTR 132 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 179 : Private company-Liability of directors-Recovery of tax— Attachment and sale of immovable property—Limitation—Final order under S. 143(3) and not Intimation u/s. 143(1)-Not barred by limitation. [S. 226, Sch. II, R. 68B, Art, 226]

PCIT v. Himanshu Chandulal Patel (2019) 419 ITR 132 / 267 Taxman 305 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search and seizure-Satisfaction of AO of person in respect of whom search conducted that document seized belonged to some other person—Satisfaction not discernible from satisfaction note—Notice is held to be invalid. [S.132, 132(4A), 292C]

PCIT v. Ankush Saluja (2019)419 ITR 431 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search and seizure –Cash credits – Addition made not on material seized during search – Unsustainable. [S. 68 132, 153A]

Vikram Singh v. CIT (2019) 267 Taxman 380 / 111 taxmann.com 119 (SC) Editorial : SLP of assessee is dismissed; Vikram Singh v. CIT (2019) 267 Taxman 380 (SC)

S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice–Notice-Sanction of Additional commissioner instead of Joint Commissioner-Joint Commissioner includes an Additional Commissioner-Notice is held to be valid. [S. 2(28C), 147, 148]

S.M. Sarveswaran (HUF) v. ITO (2019) 267 Taxman 542 / (2020) 195 DTR 46(Mad.)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment–Notice issued in name of legal heirs–Held to be valid. [S. 147]

Doosan Bobcat India Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 184 DTR 393 / (2020) 312 CTR 257 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment–With in four years-Failure to disclose material facts-Fails to challenge the reopening at the appropriate time before the Court-Not entitled to seek such indulgence, after allowing the Officer to pass the order of assessment-Writ Court cannot sit as an Appellate Authority and decide the merits of the assessment-Writ is held to be not maintainable. [S. 148, Art.226]

CIT v. Hyundai Motor India Ltd. (2019) 267 Taxman 200 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Change of opinion-Business expenditure-Technical know how-Depreciation-TP adjustments were made in the original assessment proceedings-Reassessment is held to be not valid. [S. 32(1)(ii), 37(1)]