S. 115JAA : Book profit-Deemed income-Tax credit–Demerger of SEZ units–Tribunal Order-MAT credit needs to be allowed to the assessee-not to the demerged company (SEZ units) even though the same arose on account of SEZ units. [Companies Act, S.391]

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Interest on loans to AEs-Arm’s length rate of interest is the rate prevalent in the country where the loan is received/consumed and not the country in which the assessee advances loans to its AEs-Order of settlement commission is conclusive as regards the matter there in and not on other years. [S. 245D(4), 245I]

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price–No express agreement shown to exist between assessee and AE for incurring ALP expenses for promotion of brand of AE–hence, AMP expenses cannot come within the purview of the international transaction-Determination of ALP of royalty at Nil is not sustainable-Applying rule of consistency-payment of royalty paid in earlier and subsequent years-has to be accepted.

S. 92C : Transfer pricing–AMP expenses incurred for brand building–not an international transaction–followed earlier order of tribunal in its own case–Matter remanded back-Income deemed to accrue or arise in India–Business connection–Premium for insurance policy was incurred by Adidas AG and it would only be entitled to receive claim of insurance and no income accrued to assessee–No business connection in India [S. 9(1)(i), 92B(1)]

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Assessee failing to discharge onus to prove lawful owner of cash found during course of Search-Cash in possession of Assessee to be treated as unexplained money. [S. 132]

S. 69 : Unexplained investments–HSBC in Switzerland-No addition in the absence of incriminating material found in the course of search. [S. 132, 153A]

S. 68 : Cash credits-Search and Seizure–Sale of property–Identity of the Purchaser-No incriminating material–Found during a search –Genuineness of transaction–No Cash credit–The settlement commission rejected the application–Merely on the basis of application before the Settlement commission–Addition cannot be made. [S. 153C, 245C(1)]

S. 68 : Cash Credit–Share application money–Burden of Proof-Identity, Creditworthiness and Genuineness of the Transactions on the Assessee–Mere submission of details not sufficient–Failed to discharge the burden–Addition is held to be justified-Bogus Purchases-Assessee failed to produced parties–Notice returned unserved–No documentation–Transportation and consumption– Addition is held to be justified. [S. 69]

S. 68 Cash Credits–Share Application money–Identity and Creditworthiness of the share applicant-Genuineness of the transactions-Burden of Proof–Initial onus on assessee– Discharged-Onus shift to Revenue–Addition based on suspicion is held to be invalid.

S. 68 : Cash credits-Cash deposits-Demonetization-AO acting unreasonably and capriciously in rejecting genuine explanations offered by assessee in respect of cash deposits as unsatisfactory-Additions is unsustainable. [S. 115BBE]