Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


Yum! Restaurants Marketing (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 179 ITD 480/ (2020) 190 DTR 84/ 205 TTJ 124 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 254(2) : Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record – Order of Tribunal affirmed by High Court-Coordinate bench of Tribunal, subsequent to decision of High court could not have entertained miscellaneous application of assessee and recalled order originally passed by Tribunal. [S. 260A]

Yum! Restaurants Marketing (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 179 ITD 480/(2020) 190 DTR 84/ 205 TTJ 124 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Power-Additional evidence-Tribunal is empowered to admit additional evidences in the interest of substantial justice. [ITAT, R.29]

Balwan Singh v. ITO (2019) 179 ITD 577 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)–Powers–Undisclosed investment in property-Non speaking order–Matter remanded to CIT(A).[S. 69B, 147, 148]

Jiwan Lal v. ITO (2019) 179 ITD 475 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)–Powers–Estimation of gross profit–Right of appeal was not properly exercised–Matter remanded to the CIT(A). [S. 254(1)]

Pawan Kumar Singhal v. ACIT (2019) 178 ITD 390/ 202 TTJ 221/ 183 DTR 161 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 250 : Commissioner (Appeals)-Dismissal of appeal in limine– CIT(A) cannot dismiss appeal in limine for non-prosecution without deciding same on merits-Order of CIT (A) is set aside. [S. 246A, 249, 250(6), 251]

Adani Enterprise Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 178 ITD 373 (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 206C : Collection of tax at source-Failure to collect tax at source–Limitation-No limitation is prescribed-Reasonable period of limitation of four years from end of financial year in question was to be followed-order is quashed. [S. 201(3), 206C(6A)]

ACIT v. HAL Offshore Ltd. (2019) 178 ITD 272/ 202 TTJ 308/ (2020) 185 DTR 392 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 194J : Deduction at source-Fees for professional or technical services-Arbitration charges–Payments to arbitrators is in nature of professional services rendered by legal professionals liable to deduct tax at source. [S. 40(a)(ia)]

Mahabodhi Society of India. v. ITO (2019) 74 ITR(T) 485 / 179 ITD 564 (Kol) (Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment–Foreign bequest–Request to transfer is pending-Bequest received by assessee at Sri Lanka could not be recognized as income–Reopening is held to be bad on law. [S. 2 (24)(iia), 5, 11(2), 12AA, 143(3), 148, 160(1)(iv), 161(1)]

Mayankkumar Natwarlal Soni v. ACIT (2019) 179 ITD 444/ (2020) 189 DTR 56/ 204 TTJ 761 (Ahd.) (Trib.)

S. 145 : Method of accounting–Survey–Estimation of income on the basis of estimated gross profit on sales–Rejection of books of account without any reason-Addition is held to be not valid. [S. 133A, 144]

ITO v. Ajay Raj (2019) 178 ITD 379 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 143(2) : Assessment-Service of notice-Notice served on assessee which was not as per addresses as specified in rule 127(2) of 1962 Rules, assessment based on said notice is not valid assessment. [R. 127(2)]