Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


Beena Muralidhar (Mrs.) v. TRO (2019) 266 Taxman 219 (Karn.) (HC)

S. 226 : Collection and recovery-Modes of recovery–Joint savings account with husband-TRO cannot issue notice to bank for marking said bank account for lien towards arrears of tax liability of her husband, without issuing a notice to assessee. [S. 226(3)(iii), Art.226]

Anilkumar Gopikishan Agrawal v. CIT (2019) 418 ITR 25/ ( 2020) 186 DTR 273 / 313 CTR 520(Guj.) (HC).Editorial . ITO v. Vikram Sujitkumar Bhatia (2023)453 ITR 417/ 293 Taxman 4/ 332 CTR 1/ 224 DTR 217 (SC), order of High court reversed/ Reversed ,ACIT v. Anilkumar Gopikishan Agrawal (2023)454 ITR 531 (SC)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search Search prior to 1-6-2015-S.153C as amended W.E.F. 1-6-2015 is not applicable-Limitation-Notice issued for the assessment years beyond six assessment years would be beyond jurisdiction- Writ is maintainable. [S. 132, 153A, 153B, Art. 226]

Integra Garments And Textiles Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 418 ITR 139 / 310 CTR 570/ 175 DTR 241 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment –With in four years-Transfer of leasehold rights- Allegation that the transaction is not genuine–No new material-Reassessment is held to be not valid. [S. 45, 56, 148]

CIT v. Narcissus Investments P. Ltd. (2019) 417 ITR 512/182 DTR 73/ (2020) 314 CTR 833 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Export business-No new material-Notice under direction of Commissioner-Reassessment is held to be not valid. [S. 80HHC, 148]

Chetan Sabharwal. v. ACIT (2019) 418 ITR 8 / 310 CTR 690/181 DTR 313 (Delhi)(HC) Nitn Sabharwal v. ACIT (2019) 418 ITR 8 / 310 CTR 690/181 DTR 313 ( Delhi ) (HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment–With in four years-Report of investigation wing showing over valuation of shares–Original assessment u/s. 143(1)–Notice on the ground of over valuation shares is held to be valid. [S. 143(1), 143(3), 148]

Nilamben Sandipbhai Parikh v. ACIT (2019) 266 Taxman 191 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Capital gains-Year of taxability-No new material–Reassessment is held to be not valid. [S. 45, 148]

Supra Estates India Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 418 ITR 130/( 2020) 268 Taxman 88 (Bom.) (HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Furnishing all details in response to notices-Non-application of mind by assessing officer to materials produced at the time of original assessment-Reassessment is invalid. [S. 142(1), 143(2) 148, Art. 226]

PCIT v. Jindal Stainless Ltd. (2019) 109 taxmann.com 144/ 266 Taxman 188 ( Delhi) (HC) Editorial: SLP of revenue is dismissed; PCIT v. Jindal Stainless Ltd. (2019) 266 Taxman 187 (SC)

S. 145 : Method of accounting–Valuation of stock–Goods ready for shipment had not been transferred-Declaration made in accordance with provision of sales tax is not relevant for the purpose of income-tax Act-Valuation of stock at cost or market price at the option of assessee-Held to be valid.

Deepak Rugs. v. CIT (2019) 418 ITR 179/ 310 CTR 135 / 180 DTR 141 / 267 Taxman 262 (All.) (HC)

S. 145 : Method of accounting–Not maintaining of stock record-Rejection of books of account is held to be valid-CIT(A) has the power of enhancement after giving an opportunity of hearing-No substantial question of law.[S. 145(3), 251]

Cama Hotels Ltd. v. Samir Vakil for his successor Dy. CIT (OSD) (2019) 418 ITR 109 / 182 DTR 129/ 311 CTR 537(Guj.)(HC)

S. 142(2A) : Inquiry before assessment–Special audit–Complexity in accounts–Order to Special audit is held to be valid-Juristic person like a company cannot file a writ petition. [Art. 226]