Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


PCIT v. Morgan Stanley India Capital Pvt Ltd [2025] 177 taxmann.com 699 (Bom) (HC)

S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Short deduction of tax at source-Merely a short deduction of TDS by assessee under section 194C, and persons to whom payments were made by assessee had paid taxes on such payments, Assessing Officer could not have invoked provisions of section 40(a)(ia) and disallowed expenses claimed by assessee-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S. 194C; Second proviso, 194I, 260A]

Star Time Communication (I) (P.) Ltd. v. CIT [2025] 174 taxmann.com 753 (Bom)(HC)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Infrastructure fee-Advertising receipts-Tribunal was justified in restricting deduction to 5 per cent of actual receipts in accordance with the agreement and not on the gross advertising bill-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S.145, 260A]

PCIT v. HDFC Bank Ltd. [2025] 173 taxmann.com 579 (Bom) (HC) Editorial: SLP of revenue dismissed, PCIT v. HDFC Bank Ltd. [2025] 304 Taxman 606 (SC)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Broken period interest-Securities held as stock-in-trade-Deduction allowable.[S.145, 260A]

Saigal Sea Trade v. ACIT [2025] 176 taxmann.com 75 (Bom) (HC).

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Personal element-Disallowance-Pure finding of fact-Commission payment-Services not established-Finding of fact-No substantial question of law.[S.260A]

PCIT v. ICICI Securities Ltd. [2025] 174 taxmann.com 160 (Bom) (HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Client assistant charges-Three-in-one account scheme-Expenditure incurred for business allowable-Provision for loss-Contingent liability-Conservative principle-Deduction allowable [S. 145, 260A]

PCIT v. Watson Pharma (P.) Ltd. [2025] 173 taxmann.com 957 (Bom) (HC)

S. 36(1)(vii) : Bad debt-Advances-Business loss-Write-off of unrecovered advances-Genuineness not disputed-Deduction allowable. [S,28(i), 260A]

PCIT v. Morgan Stanley India Capital Pvt Ltd [2025] 177 taxmann.com 699 (Bom) (HC)

S.14A: Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Interest-free funds-Non-interest-bearing funds were more than the investment made in tax-free securities; it would be presumed that the investment made by the assessee would be from its interest-free funds and, thus, no disallowance under section 14A could be made-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S.260A, Rule 8D]

PCIT v. Mahindra Engineering Services Ltd. [2025] 180 taxmann.com 759 (Bom)(HC)

S. 10A: Free trade zone-STP Unit-New infrastructure, plant and machinery, software and separately recruited workforce-Undertaking not formed by splitting up or reconstruction of existing business-Deduction allowable-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S. 10A(2), 260A]

Vidya Sagar Sharma v. UOI(2026) 349 CTR 121 /184 taxmann.com 44 (J&K)(HC)

Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2024.
S 91 : Filing of declaration and particulars to be furnished-Prior tax position revived when assessee does not comply with provisions / requirements of DTVSV Act 2020 and hence eligible under DTVSV Act 2024.[DTVSV Act, 2020, S. 4(6), 5(1)Art. 226]

Shiv Kumar Jaiswal v. State of UP. (2026) 349 CTR 228/ 182 taxmann.com 684 (All)(HC)

S. 276C : Offences and prosecutions-Wilful attempt to evade tax-When the subject matter of the penalty, which was the very basis on which criminal proceedings had been launched, was set aside, criminal proceedings could not be allowed to continue.[S.271(1)(c), 277]