Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


TLG India Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (TDS) (2019) 418 ITR 324/ 267 Taxman 319/ 184 DTR 329 ( 2020) 312 CTR 179 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 194C : Deduction at source–Contractors advertisement services-Principle of natural justice must be followed-Assessing Officer is not justified in deciding that tax should be deducted under Section 194J without giving an opportunity of hearing. [S. 194J, 197,201(1), 201(IA), Art. 226]

B. Muralidhar. v. DCIT (2019) 267 Taxman 35 /(2020) 424 ITR 397 / 187 DTR 162 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 179 : Private company-Liability of directors–Alternative remedy is available by way of revision-Writ petition is dismissed. [S.264, Art.226]

S. Ajit Kumar. v. ACIT (2019)419 ITR 260/ 266 Taxman 380/ 184 DTR 449 /(2020) 314 CTR 687(Mad.)(HC)

S. 158BFA : Block assessment–Penalty–Limitation-Pursuant to supreme Court’s order deciding quantum of appeal in favour of revenue–Dormant penalty proceedings were reinitiated–Order is not barred by limitation–Order of Tribunal was merged with the order of the Supreme Court. [S. 158BFA(3)(c), 253, 271(1)(c), 275]

Epson India P. Ltd. v. ACIT (2019) 418 ITR 267/ 311 CTR 925 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment–Jurisdiction-Deputy Commissioner had jurisdiction to issue notice–Petition dismissed. [S.147,Art. 226]

PCIT v. Tata Sons Ltd. (2019) 267 Taxman 13 (Bom.)(HC),Editorial:PCIT v. Tata Sons Ltd. (2022)449 ITR 166 (SC), affirmed .

S. 148 : Reassessment–Notice–Issue of notice prior to recording of reasons for reopening of assessment is held to be without jurisdiction–Deserves to be quashed–Defects could not be cured by invoking S.292B of the Act. [S. 147, 292B ]

Ravindra Kumar (HUF) @ Rabindra Kumar (HUF) v. CIT (2019) 419 ITR 308/ 266 Taxman 506/ 311 CTR 912 / 184 DTR 315(Patna) (HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment–Agricultural income-Advisory issued by the department–Verify the income-Undisclosed income-No tangible material-Reassessment is held to be bad in law. [S. 2(IA), 148, Art. 226]

Kisan Agro Mart (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 103 taxmann.com 374 / 266 Taxman 374 (Bom.)(HC) Editorial: SLP of assessee is dismissed, Kisan Agro Mart (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 266 Taxman 373 (SC)/ 417 ITR 63 (St.)(SC)

S. 147 : Reassessment–Alternative remedy–Writ petition was dismissed on the ground that the assessee had availed alternative remedy. [S. 148, 251, Art. 226]

Giriraj Enterprises v. ACIT (2019) 174 DTR 409 / 102 taxmann.com 188 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment–Fishing enquiry–Information from intelligence wing-Builder-Make detailed enquiry-Reassessment is held to be bad in law. [S. 28(i), 148, Art. 226]

State Bank of India. v. CIT (2019) 418 ITR 485 / 175 DTR 335/103 taxmann.com 164 / 310 CTR 560 (Bom.)(HC).Editorial , PCIT v. SBI (2022)447 ITR 368 / (2023) 290 Taxman 3(SC), affirmed

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Outstanding credit balances-No failure to disclose material facts– Reassessment is held to be not valid. [S. 148, Art, 226]

Meghavi Minerals (P.) Ltd. v. CIT (2019) 267 Taxman 1 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment–After the expiry of four years-Information by Investigation wing–Accommodation entries-Pravin Kumar Jain-One of the beneficiary–Reassessment is held to be valid [ S.69, 132(4), 148, 151, Art. 226]