Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


CIT v. Cavinkare (P.) Ltd. (2019) 263 Taxman 740 / 309 CTR 453/ 180 DTR 137(Mad.)(HC)

S. 80IA : Industrial undertakings–Manufacture-Converting herbs into a certain herbal product by manual process-Purchase of plant and machinery and consumption of electricity are not mandatory requirements-Entitle to deduction.

PCIT v. Vodafone Essar Gujarat Ltd. (2019) 263 Taxman 632 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 80IA : Industrial undertakings–Telecommunication business-Net interest earned is eligible for deduction.

CIT v. Lok Sewa Sansthan Samiti Sonebhadra (2019) 105 taxmann.com 202 / 263 taxman 496 (All.)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed, CIT v. Lok Sewa Sansthan Samiti Sonebhadra (2019) 263 Taxman 495 (SC)

S. 80G : Donation-When registration is granted application u/s. 80G(5) cannot be rejected.[S. 12AA, 80G(5)]

R. Bhoopathy v. CIT (2019) 263 Taxman 411/ 176 DTR 239 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits–Capitalisation fee–Statement on oath-Search and seizure – Undisclosed income was disclosed–Addition of capitalization fee is held to be not valid. [S. 132(4), 158BC]

PCIT v. E -Smart Systems (P.) Ltd. (2019)105 taxmann.com 158 / 263 Taxman 374 (Delhi) (HC) Editorial: SLP of revenue is dismissed, PCIT v. E- Smart Systems (P.) Ltd. (2019) 263 Taxman 373 (SC)

S. 68 : Cash credits–Share capital-Two foreign nationals–Directors of the company-Identity of share applicants and genuineness of money infused is established- Deletion of addition is held to be justified.

National Company v. ACIT (2019) 415 ITR 5 / 263 Taxman 511/ 310 CTR 217 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 45(4) : Capital gains–Retirement-Allotment to a partner of his share in assets of partnership after deduction of liabilities is not transfer – Not liable to capital gains tax. [S. 2(47)(vi)]

CIT v. Dharma Productions (P.) Ltd. (2019) 263 Taxman 585 / 308 CTR 809 / 177 DTR 321 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure–Cost of print and publicity–cost of production- Feature films -Expenditure were incurred after production and certification of film by Censor Board was received – Not governed by Rule 9A- Allowable as revenue expenditure. [R. 9A 9B]

PCIT v. Gujarat Lease Financing Ltd. (2019) 105 taxmann.com 156 263 Taxman 351 (Guj.)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed, PCIT v. Gujarat Lease Financing Ltd. (2019) 263 Taxman 350 (SC)

S. 36(1)(vii) : Bad debt-Held to be allowable though the principal amount debited to the principal amount never appeared as a debt on account of trade.

CIT v. Oberon Edifices & Estates (P.) Ltd. (2019) 263 Taxman 377/ 311 CTR 815/ 184 DTR 56 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 28(i) : Business income-Income from house property–Shopping mall -Commercial exploitation-Facilities and services-Income derived by assessee by letting out shops in mall had to be assessed as income from business and not as income from house property. [S. 22]

PCIT v. Moonstar Securities Trading and Finance Co. (P.) Ltd. (2019) 105 taxmann.com 274 /263 Taxman 459 (Delhi) (HC) Editorial: SLP of revenue is dismissed, PCIT v. Moonstar Securities Trading and Finance Co. (P.) Ltd. (2019) 263 Taxman 458 (SC)

S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income–AO cannot reject the disallowances offered by the assessee, without adducing any reasons. [R. 8D]