S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue – Reassessment- Merger – Since the second round of reassessment proceedings were on the same set of facts as the first round, the same were dropped by the AO and thus the first reassessment order stood merged with the second.- Thus, the said order cannot be revised under Section 263 of the Act since only the valid reassessment order can be revised. [S.143(1), 147, 148]

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue – Reassessment – Invalid reassessment order cannot be revised – Revision u/s 263 cannot be made if reassessment u/s 147 was invalid, as reassessment was made without issue of notice u/s 143(2) [ S.143(2), 147]

S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)–Powers-Unexplained expenditure-Opportunity of cross examination-powers of Commissioner (Appeals) are co-terminus with powers of Assessing Officer and if Assessing Officer failed to discharge its functions properly and conduct proper cross-examination and other enquiry, Commissioner (Appeals) ought to have allowed cross-examination of said parties Matter remanded back for fresh consideration. [S. 69C]

S. 201 : Deduction at source-Shortfall in deposit of TDS-Adjusted against the excess deposit in earlier years–No interest u/s. 201(1A)-Net result after adjustment is excess deposit of TDS by assessee. [S. 201(IA), 245]

S. 153 : Assessment–Limitation–Order of assessment passed within time but dispatched after expiry of time limit, Assessment held to be barred by limitation. [S. 153(2A)].

S. 147 : Reassessment–Notice–Reassessment without issuance of notice u/s. 143(2) is invalid and liable to be quashed. [S. 148]

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-AO had made elaborate enquiry during original assessment and the Assessee had fully and truly disclosed all material facts–Reassessment is held to be bad in law. [S. 68, 148]

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Adjustment ought to be made only on proportionate value of the international transaction and could not be made at an entity level.

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-When TPO has accepted assessee’s segmental bifurcation to arrive at TP adjustments, no adjustment is warranted in hands of assessee under such head- A Company who is not a persistent loss making concern can be included in final set of comparables–Functionally different companies cannot be good comparable-Foreign exchange fluctuations should be treated as operating income for Transfer pricing purposes.[S. 92CA]

S. 80IB : Industrial undertakings-Ownership of property is not a condition for claiming deduction.