Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


Institute of Chartered Accountants of India v. State of U.P (2019) 265 Taxman 5 (All.)(HC)

S. 16 : Officers and employees, salary, allowances, etc-Termination of service of employee-State Government was not competent authority to refer industrial dispute against petitioners to Industrial Tribunal- Central Government has the jurisdiction-Award passed was set aside.[ Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 S. 2(a)(i)]

Duo Meadows (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 265 Taxman 221 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 281B : Provisional attachment-Pendency of appeal-Stay-Directed the revenue authorities not to enforce the order until a decision is taken by the appellate Authority on stay application filed by the assessee. [Art. 226]

Darius Sammotashaw v. DIT (Inv.) (2019) 265 Taxman 8 (Mag.) (Bom.)(HC)

S. 281B : Provisional attachment–Search-Attachment of bank accounts and two immoveable properties-Tax, interest penalties were unlikely to exceed attached two immoveable properties-Directed to lift provisional attachment on bank accounts. [S. 132]

Sajid Salimbhai Saiyed v. UOI (2019) 265 Taxman 191 (Guj.) (HC)

S. 281 : Certain transfers to be void–Attachment of property to recover the tax–Direction of TRO to hand over possession of property is stayed-Assessee directed to appear before TRO and adduce necessary evidence for discharging the liability. [Art. 226]

PCIT v. Prakashchandra S Soni, HUF (2019) 107 taxmann.com 86 / 265 Taxman 16 (Guj.)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed, PCIT v. Prakashchandra S Soni, HUF (2019) 265 Taxman 15 (SC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty–Concealment–Sale of good will and Trade of firm is held to be taxable as capital gain-Deletion of penalty is held to be justified.[S. 28(i), 45]

Mahaveer Yadav v. ITO (2019) 107 taxmann.com 379 / 265 Taxman 379 (Raj.)(HC) Editorial : SLP of the assessee is dismissed, Mahaveer Yadav v. ITO (2019) 265 Taxman 162 (SC)

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court–Dismissal of revive petition is held to be valid–Order of Appellate Tribunal is affirmed in absence of demonstrated perversity in the order of Tribunal its finding. [S. 254(1)]

Ajay Surendra Patel v. Dy.CIT (2019) 107 taxmann.com 221 / 265 Taxman 87 ( Guj) (HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed, DCIT v. Ajay Surendra Patel. (2019) 265 Taxman 86 (SC)

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court–Recalling of its earlier judgment on ground that it contained some factual inadvertent error and judgements relied on without giving an opportunity to the petitioner–Held to be valid. [S. 179]

Kerala Cricket Association v. ACIT (2019) 265 Taxman 17 / 181 DTR 153/ 310 CTR 273 (SC)

S. 260A : Appeal–High Court-High Court disposed of appeals against order of reassessment merely on basis of its decision on issue of registration under S. 12A and not on merits-Order was to be set aside and, appeals were to be restored to file of High Court for disposal on merits. [S. 12A, 147, 148]

PCIT v. Alpana Bhartia (Smt.) (2019) 265 Taxman 18 (Mag)/ 182 DTR 245/ 311 CTR 732 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 254(2) : Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record–The order passed under section 254(2) cannot be rectified nor amended by invoking sub-section (2) of section 254 once again-Repetitive applications under section 254(2) of the Act are not permissible. [S. 254(1)]

Rakesh P Sheth. v. ITC (2019) 265 Taxman 200 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)–Powers–Stay-Order of CIT(A) rejecting the stay application is set aside. [Art. 226]