S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue– Land held as stock in trade-Revision is held to be not valid.
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue– Land held as stock in trade-Revision is held to be not valid.
S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Payments prohibited by law- Reinsurance payments to non-Residents is not prohibited by law-The Tribunal has no power to exceed an order of remand by the High Court-Tribunal must decide issues raised in appeal—Tribunal has no power to declare Transaction illegal under different statute—Matter remanded to decide accordance with law. [S. 37(1), 40(a)(i), Insurance Act, 1938, S. 2(16B), 101A, 114A]
S. 226 : Collection and recovery-Modes of recovery-Appeal pending before CIT (A)–Upon payment of Rs.15 lakhs-Garnishee proceedings lifted. [S. 226 (3)]
S. 158BFA : Block assessment–Penalty-Undisclosed income-Not disclosed in the return–15% of undisclosed receipt was added as undisclosed income–Penalty is leviable. [S. 158B(b), 158BC]
S. 158BC : Block assessment-Undisclosed income—Does not mean entire undisclosed receipts—Tribunal justified in estimating 15% percentage of undisclosed receipts as undisclosed income. [S.158B(b)]
S. 147 : Reassessment-Claim for deduction cannot be made in Reassessment—Limitation- Not barred by limitation.[S. 149]
S. 147 : Reassessment-Notice based on appellate order-Documents showing share transactions were not genuine–Stockbrokers had elucidated on the sham and bogus nature of the share transaction- Matter remanded. [S. 68, 148]
S. 147 : Reassessment-Certificate was not produced -Inadvertently the deduction was allowed-Based on earlier years appellate order reassessment is held to be valid. [S. 80HHC, 148]
S. 147 : Reassessment—Change of opinion—Provision for diminution in the value of an asset and provision for doubtful debts-Held to be bad in law. [S. 115JB, 148]
S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Transfer of asset to subsidiary-Subsequent transfer by subsidiary to third party -Transaction was disclosed in the original assessment proceedings- Re assessment is held to be not valid. [S. 148]