Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


CIT v. Sunil Sankhla (2019) 411 ITR 437 (Raj.)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue– Land held as stock in trade-Revision is held to be not valid.

Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 411 ITR 386 / 261 Taxman 414/ 176 DTR 397/ 309 CTR 252/Mad.) (HC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Payments prohibited by law- Reinsurance payments to non-Residents is not prohibited by law-The Tribunal has no power to exceed an order of remand by the High Court-Tribunal must decide issues raised in appeal—Tribunal has no power to declare Transaction illegal under different statute—Matter remanded to decide accordance with law. [S. 37(1), 40(a)(i), Insurance Act, 1938, S. 2(16B), 101A, 114A]

R. Panneerselvam v. DGI (Inv.) (2019)411 ITR 546/ 263 Taxman 195 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 226 : Collection and recovery-Modes of recovery-Appeal pending before CIT (A)–Upon payment of Rs.15 lakhs-Garnishee proceedings lifted. [S. 226 (3)]

CIT v. C. Najeeb (2019) 411 ITR 487/ 178 DTR 83/ 309 CTR 77 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 158BFA : Block assessment–Penalty-Undisclosed income-Not disclosed in the return–15% of undisclosed receipt was added as undisclosed income–Penalty is leviable. [S. 158B(b), 158BC]

CIT v. C. Najeeb (2019) 411 ITR 487/ 178 DTR 57/ 309 CTR 77 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 158BC : Block assessment-Undisclosed income—Does not mean entire undisclosed receipts—Tribunal justified in estimating 15% percentage of undisclosed receipts as undisclosed income. [S.158B(b)]

CIT v. Punalur Paper Mills Ltd. (2019) 411 ITR 563/ 176 DTR 342/ 309 CTR 42 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Claim for deduction cannot be made in Reassessment—Limitation- Not barred by limitation.[S. 149]

CIT v. Geetanjali Credits and Capital Limited. (2019) 411 ITR 338/ 307 CTR 125/ 174 DTR 217 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Notice based on appellate order-Documents showing share transactions were not genuine–Stockbrokers had elucidated on the sham and bogus nature of the share transaction- Matter remanded. [S. 68, 148]

Baby Marine Exports v. ACIT (2019) 411 ITR 230 / 175 DTR 364(Ker.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Certificate was not produced -Inadvertently the deduction was allowed-Based on earlier years appellate order reassessment is held to be valid. [S. 80HHC, 148]

Rallis India Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 411 ITR 452 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment—Change of opinion—Provision for diminution in the value of an asset and provision for doubtful debts-Held to be bad in law. [S. 115JB, 148]

Bharti Infratel Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 411 ITR 403/ 174 DTR 169 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Transfer of asset to subsidiary-Subsequent transfer by subsidiary to third party -Transaction was disclosed in the original assessment proceedings- Re assessment is held to be not valid. [S. 148]