S. 276C : Offences and prosecutions – Wilful attempt to evade tax –Concealment of income- Appeal- Failure to produce documents to prove there was no willful default -Additional evidence – Appellate Court has the power to admit additional evidence in the interest of justice . [ S.271(1) (c ) , 278B(3 ) , Criminal Procedure Code , 1973 , S. 190, 200 , 391 ]

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue – Estimate of income- Possible view – Revision is held to be not justified – Dropping of concealment penalty by the Assessing Officer – Revision order directing to levy of 300% – Tribunal affirming 200% levy of penalty – Order of tribunal is affirmed . [S.133A, 271(1) (c ) ]

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue – Provision for warranty – Revision order is held to be not valid .[ S.143(3) ]

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue –
Assessing Officer making enquiries pertaining to remuneration of partners and expenses and receipts – Order is neither erroneous nor prejudicial to interests of revenue .

S. 254(2): Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record –Bogus purchases —Statement by Investigation Wing- Disallowance of 15% of unverifiable purchases – Order of Tribunal is affirmed – Rejection of rectification is held to be justified [ S. 69C , 132 ,147 , 148, Art , 226 ]

251 : Appeal – Commissioner (Appeals) – Powers – Powers of Appellate Authorities — Appellate Authorities can consider claim not raised before Assessing Officer Education cess is held to be deductible . [ S. 40(a)(ii) 254(1) ]

S. 251 : Appeal – Commissioner (Appeals) – Powers – Claim for allowability of lease rent which was neither made in the return nor before the Assessing Officer – Cannot be raised first time before Commissioner (Appeals) without any evidences [ S.37(1), 246A ]

S.245C: Settlement Commission – Settlement of cases –Powers – Settlement Commission cannot consider merits of case at the stage of admission [ S .245D(2C ) ]

S.234F: Fee for default in furnishing return of income -Delay in filing return – Levying fee – Provision is held to be valid [ Art , 14 , 226 ]

S. 234C : Interest – Deferment of advance tax – Mere filing of review petition before Supreme Court could not be ground for not paying advance tax . [ S.119 ]