Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


Infineon Technologies (P) Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2019) 112 taxmann.com 401 / 269 Taxman 53 (Karn.)(HC) Editorial: SLP is granted to the assessee Infineon Technologies (P) Ltd v. Dy. CIT (2020) 269 Taxman 52 (SC)

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty Payments made for import of software for imparting of information concerning technical industrial commercial or scientific knowledge etc-Assessable as royalty-Liable to deduct tax at source. [S. 9(1)(vii), 195]

Nippon Steel Engineering Co. Ltd. (2020) 269 Taxman 243 / ( 2019) 112 taxmann.com 132 (AAR)

S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Amount received/receivable by applicant under equipment supply contract awarded by an Indian company for off shore supply of Coke Dry Quenching (CDQ) units would not be chargeable to tax in India-DTAA-India-Japan. [Art. 7]

Hitachi High Technologies Singapore Pte Ltd. (2019) 202 TTJ 273 / (2020) 180 ITD 861/ 187 DTR 223 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Liaison office-Involved in preparatory and auxiliary activities but also involved in ascertaining customer requirements, price negotiations obtaining of purchase orders etc- Constituted PE in India and profit attribution has to be done-DTAA-India-Singapore. [S. 92, Art. 5]

CIT(IT) v. Nortel Network Singapore (Pte) Ltd. (2019) 111 taxmann.com 222 (Delhi) (HC) Editorial: SLP is granted to the revenue; CIT(IT) v. Nortel Network Singapore (Pte) Ltd. (2019) 111 taxmann.com 222 / 269 Taxman 23 (SC)

S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Supervisory activities should be more than 183 days in a fiscal year-No part of income from transaction is assessable in India-DTAA-India-Singapore. [Art. 5, 12]

EOS GmbH-India Branch v. Dy.CIT (IT) (2020) 420 ITR 119 /269 Taxman 223/ 187 DTR 22 2/ 313 CTR 755(Mad.)(HC)

S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Challenging the show cause notice seeking to tax entire income earned by its parent German Company in India-Factual issues are involved-Directed to file objection before DRP- Matter remanded. [S. 144C, Art. 226]

PCIT v. Rohan Projects (2020) 269 Taxman 212 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 5 : Scope of total income–Accrual of income–Time of accrual-Year of taxability-Developer of land-Part of sale consideration was payable by purchaser on completion of assessee’s obligation under MOU-Not liable to tax relevant assessment year. [S. 4, 145]

PCIT v. H. P. Excise And Taxation Technical Service Agency. (2020) 113 taxmann.com 86 / 269 Taxman 21 (HP)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed ; PCIT v. H. P. Excise And Taxation Technical Service Agency. (2020) 269 Taxman 20 (SC)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax–Amount paid to Government as per bye-laws of assessee-society–Held to be not taxable, even though assessee was not registered under section 12AA nor its income was exempt under any of provisions of Act. [S. 12AA]

DDIT v. Ramesh Dang (2020) 269 Taxman 110 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 2(28) : Inspector of Income-tax-Service matters-Technical Assistant-Equal pay scale-In absence of any recommendations of an expert body like Central Pay Commission or Anomalies Committee, CAT could not grant parity in pay scales-Order of CAT is set aside. [Art.226, 227]

Surendra Engg. Corpn. v. JCIT (2020) 180 ITD 708 (Mum.) (Trib.)

S. 271D: Penalty–Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Loan from partner–Bonafide belief–Levy of penalty is held to be not justified. [S. 269SS, 273B]

B.E. Billimoria & Co. Ltd. v. PCIT (2020) 180 ITD 808/ 192 DTR 114/ 206 TTJ 650 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue- Return of income-Without audit report-Revised return along with audit report-Loss is allowed to be carried forward–Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 44AB, 80, 139(3)]