Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


Dy.CIT v. Nirma University ( 2018) 64 ITR 60 ( Ahd) (Trib)

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes – Depreciation- Income to be computed in normal commercial manner without classification under various heads referred in S.14 of the Act. [ S.14, 32 ]

CIT v. Container Corporation of India Ltd (2018) 404 ITR 397/ 165 DTR 353 /302 CTR 221 / 255 Taxman 334 (SC), www.itatonline.org

Interpretation -Communication of Ministry of Commerce can be relied on – Inland ports.

PCIT v. Mobisoft Tele Solutions (P) LTD. (P) LTD. (2018) 404 ITR 203 / 163 DTR 289 / 301 CTR 582/90 taxmann. com 383 (P&H) (HC)

S. 47A : Capital gains – Withdrawal of exemption – Conversion of proprietary concern in to company – Only licence to use Brand name – When exemption from capital gain was not claimed -Deletion of addition was held to be justified [ S.47 ]

K. V. Abdul Azeez v. CIT (2018) 404 ITR 288/ 253 Taxman 210 / 168 DTR 74/ 204 CTR 801(Ker)(HC)

S. 260A : Appeal – High Court – Jurisdiction and limitation issue can be raised for the first time in appeal [ S.153C, 253 ]

ACIT v. Beena Kedia ( Delhi) (Trib)

S. 271AAA : Penalty – Search initiated on or after 1st June, 2007 –When no specific query to substantiate the manner of earning undisclosed income was put forward to the assessee by the authorised officer levy of penalty was held to be not valid when the taxes were paid on the amount surrendered [ S.132(4) ]

Suklendu A.Baji v.DCIT ( Mum) (Trib)

S.45: Capital gains- Amount received on transfer of rights to carry on any business is taxable as capital gain and not as business income [ S.28(va),54EC ]

CIT ( E ) v. Tara Educational & Charitable Trust ( Bom) (HC)

S. 12AA : Procedure for registration –Trust or institution-Registration cannot be refused on the ground that the Trust deed does not contain dissolution clause .[ S.12A]

PCIT v. Spicer India Ltd ( Bom) (HC)

S. 43A : Rate of exchange – Foreign currency – Foreign exchange fluctuation on loan liability on fixed asset being notional and no actual payment was made would not require any adjustment in the cost of the fixed assets on accrual basis , as the S.43A is amended w.e.f 1 st April , 2003 . [ S.37(1) ]

Neha Saraf v. ITO ( Mum) (Trib)

S. 17(2) : Perquisite -Interest free loan is taxable as perquisites in the hands of employee as per Rule 3 of the IT Rules [S.17(2) (viii) R.3(7)(i) ]

Jaya Balajee Real Media Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (2018) 404 ITR 124 / 167 DTR 465/ 303 CTR 489 (T&AP) (HC)

Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana Scheme, 2016

S.199C Declaration under Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana Scheme after search and seizure – Retention was held to be valid -Court directed to release of small part of seized amount .[ S. 132, 132B ]