Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


Nokia Networks OY, v. JCIT ( 2018) 65 ITR 23/ 167 DTR 137/ 194 TTJ 137 /171 ITD 1 ( SB) (Delhi ( Trib) www.itatonline.org

S. 9(1)(i):Income deemed to accrue or arise in India – Business connection -Subsidiary of a foreign company constitutes “business connection” and/ or “fixed Permanent Establishment” and/or “Dependent Agent Permanent Establishment” of assessee in India-Held No , (b) whether any attributes of profits on account of signing, network planning and negotiation of off-shore supply contracts in India could be attributed to such business connection/ permanent establishment -Held No and (c) whether notional interest on delayed consideration of supply of equipment and licensing of software taxable in the hands of assessee as interest from vendor financing- Held No -DTAA- India –Finland –Majoriy view is in favour of the assesee. [ Art .5, 7 ]

B. L. Passi v. CIT ( 2018) 404 ITR 19/ 165 DTR 143 / 302 CTR 81/ 255 Taxman 143 (SC) , www.itatonline.org

Interpretation of taxing statutes – Interpretation of taxing statutes to be construed harmoniously with object of statute.

ACIT v. Bharat V. Patel (2018) 404 ITR 37/ 165 DTR 218/ 302 CTR 110 / 255 Taxman 324 (SC) , www.itatonline.org

Interpretation of taxing statutes – Income -tax -General principles -Taxing provisions must be construed strictly so that no person who is otherwise not liable to pay tax , be liable to pay tax .

Seabird Exploration Fz Llc, In Re (2018) 403 ITR 82/302 CTR 19 / 165 DTR 33 (AAR)

S. 44BB : Mineral oils – Computation -Consideration received under contract is not fees for technical fees or royalty -Consideration received was held to be taxable as business income – DTAA -India United Arab Emirates- Duration of operation of less than 120 days is not material . [ S. 9(1) (vi), 9(1)(vii) Art. 5(1),12 ]

CIT v. Sunita Dhadda [2018] 403 ITR 309 (St.) (SC)/Editorial : Order in CIT v. Sunita Dhadda (2018) 406 ITR 220 ( Raj) (HC)// CIT v. Vijay Laxmi Dhadda (Smt) (2018) 406 ITR 220 ( Raj) (HC) is affirmed .

S. 69 :Unexplained investments – ‘On-money’ – Sale of land -Burden is on the department to show that ‘on-money’ consideration passed to the seller from the purchaser- Opportunity to cross examine the witnesses was not provided to the assessee- Addition was deleted . [ S.131 ]

Council of the ICAI v. Ashok Kumar ( 2018) 252 Taxman 129 ( Delhi) (HC)

Chartered Accountants Act, 1949

S. 21: Misconduct – SEBI and Disciplinary Committee of ICAI have found the respondent Chartered Accountant is guilty of several irregularities in public issue of a company – Removal of name from Register of Members of ICAI for a period of one year was held to be valid .

CIT v. Bansi Lal Gupta ( 2018) 300 CTR 332 ( J& K) (HC)

S. 80IB : Industrial undertakings – Splitting up or reconstruction-Printing press- New industrial undertaking of printing press is not the expansion of existing unit, hence entitle to deduction.

CIT v. Arun Thomas ( 2018) 161 DTR 161/300 CTR 276 (Ker) (HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure -Acceptance of deposits prohibited by law- Interest paid on deposits is held to be not allowable as deduction in view of Explanation to S. 37(1) of the Act .[ Kerala Money Lenders Act, 1958,S.4, 17 , RBI Act, 1934 S. 45S ]

CIT v. B. C. Management Services Pvt. Ltd. (2018) 403 ITR 45 / 253 Taxman 128 /164 DTR 299 / 302 CTR 167 (Delhi) (HC)

S.92C: Transfer pricing Arm’s Length Price -Selection of comparables — Functional dissimilarities and distinction in services provided has to be excluded . [ S.92CA ]

CIT v. Becton Dickinson India (P) Ltd ( 2018) 92 taxmann.com 45/254 Taxman 382 ( Delhi) (HC)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing – Arm’s length price -Unless it is shown that there are important functional dissimilarities or other material facts ,exclusion or inclusion of other comparable would not constitute substantial question of law [ S.260A ]