S. 153 : Assessment–Reassessment–Limitation–Settlement commission admitted the Application on 30-8-1996, admitted tax and interest was not paid and during pendency of proceedings- S. 245HA and 245D were amended providing abatement due to non-payment by 31-7-2007-Constitutional validity of which was challenged and finally case was abated in 2016- Assessment order was passed within 60 days was not time barred. [S. 245C(1), 245HA, 245D]

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel -Non -speaking order – Order passed by DTP without giving any reasons for rejecting objections raised by assessee- ,Order was set aside and, matter was to be remanded back for disposal afresh.[S. 92C]

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Form 26AS-Merely on the basis of information form 26AS submitted by the deductor, addition cannot be made, as the assessee had no control over inputs made by the deductor. [ S. 4]

S. 71 : Set off of loss-One head against income from another-Assessee has the option to set off business loss against capital gains – It is not mandatory. [S. 71(3), 80]

S. 69B : Amounts of investments not fully disclosed in books of account –Undisclosed investments- Excess stock-Mismatch in quantity of stock- Reconciliation filed with District Supply Officer was accepted -Addition is held to be not justified.

S. 69B : Amounts of investments not fully disclosed in books of account –Capital accounts -Books of account – Firm -Partner -Share in partnership was not included in the books of account- Difference was explained – Addition was held to be not justified.

S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Foreign remittances-From a foreign bank, as a result of disbursements from a family trust-Addition is held to be not justified.

S. 68 : Cash credit-Gift from father–Failure to bring on record any material evidence to prove creditworthiness and capacity of his father to advance huge amount of cash gift from any known source of income-Addition is held to be justified [S. 56(2)(viic)]

S. 68 : Cash credit-Credit entry in capital account-Maintenance of one set of accounts for himself, as an individual and other set of accounts for his sole proprietorship concern is valid – Capital introduced cannot be added as cash credit when proper explanation is furnished.

S. 68 : Cash credits-Share premium -Equity shares and preference shares stand on different footing and thus, net asset value method could not be used in case of preference shares to compute excess share premium charged on those shares so as to make addition as cash credits.