S.68: Cash credits- Share application money-Existing share holders- Confirmation and other details were filed -Addition as undisclosed was held to be not justified .

S. 68: Cash credits- Sale of shares – Offline transactions- Merely on the ground that six companies failed to reply to notices issued to them, addition was held to be not justified . [ S. 133(6)]

S. 68: Cash credits- Share application- The assesse explained the source of money received and was not answerable for source of the money in the hands of investors .

S.37(1): Business expenditure -Expenses to keep its status of the Company active was held to be allowable as business expenditure as business loss .[ S. 28(i) ]

S. 32: Depreciation – Option- Newly established industrial undertakings – Back ward areas –Additional question was admitted and the matter was remanded to the Tribunal to consider factual aspect [ S. 80HH, 260A(4)]

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes – Quality control accreditation of organisations -Application fees membership fees and fees for organising seminars-Entitle to exemption[ S. 2(15), 12 ]

Adjournment –Delay in filing affidavit of reply – Cost of Rs.4 , 50,000 / was levied .

Central Goods and Service Tax Act , 2017
GST Network: The regime is not tax friendly.

Service tax – Finance Act, 1994
S.65:Service-tax on maintenance of property-Under the MOFA, the builder/ developer is under a statutory obligation to look after the day-to-day upkeep, maintenance and repair of the property till conveyance to the co-op society. Such maintenance of the structure is not rendering a taxable service as per S. 65 (64) of the Finance Act, 1994