Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


DCIT v. Laboratories Griffon (P.) Ltd. (2018) 170 ITD 387/ 65 ITR 317 /195 TTJ 855/( 2019) 178 DTR 355 (Kol) (Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii) :Interest on borrowed capital -Interest on loan taken for renovation and modernisation of factory premises is allowable as deduction .

DCIT v. Vodafone Essar Digilink Ltd. (2018) 170 ITD 430 / 193 TTJ 150/ 166 DTR 233/ 64 ITR 392 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S.32: Depreciation- Lease premises -Notionally estimated cost and capitalised for restoration of office spaces for setting up of cell site towers – Depreciation is held to be not allowable [ S.43(1) ]

Edel Commodities Ltd. v. DCIT ( 2018) 170 ITD 402/166 DTR 289/194 TTJ 86 (Mum) (Trib.)

S.28(i): Business loss -Derivatives- loss at end of year on mark to market basis could not be disallowed on ground that same was contingent in nature [ S.37(1) ]

Vision Iknowledge Solutions Pvt Ltd v PCIT ( 2018) 64 ITR 85 ( Delhi) (Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue -Deduction allowed u/s 10A allowed before adjustment unabsorbed depreciation or losses is held to be valid- Revision was held to be not valid . [ S.10A ]

Manojkumar Babulal Agarwal v. Secretary, ITSC ( 2017) 83 taxmann.com 139/( 2018) 406 ITR 481 ( Guj) (HC) Editorial: SLP is granted to the assessee , Manojkumar Babulal Agarwal v. Secretary, ITSC ( 2018) 255 Taxman ( 2018) 255 Taxman 170 (SC)/ 403 ITR 311 ( St.)

S. 245D : Settlement Commission -Broker – Search and seizure- Failure to substantiate that entire unaccounted income from seized documents did not belong to him in respect of off market commodity transactions and hedging transaction -Rejection of application was held to be justified [ S. 69A, 153A, 245C ]

ITO v. Remco ( BHEL) House Building Co -Operative Society Ltd ( 2018) 64 ITR 39 ( Bang) (Trib)

S. 194C : Deduction at source – Contractors – Payments to contractor for purchase of land and not development of works carried out is not liable to deduct tax at source [ S. 201(1) 201(IA) ]

Rama Goyal (Smt) v.ITO ( 2018) 64 ITR 1 ( Jaipur) (Trib)

S. 151 : Reassessment – Sanction for issue of notice – After the expiry of four years- Approval was not obtained – Reassessment was held to be bad in law [ S.147, 148 ]

Dy CIT v. Jaipur Rugs Co. P. Ltd (2018) 64 ITR 128 / 193 TTJ 49 (UR)( Jaipur) (Trib)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel – Defect in existing in original assessment order cannot be cured – show cause notice cannot be equated with assessment order – Oder passed without passing draft assessment was seta side .

CIT v. Keihin Fie ( P) Ltd ( 2018) 255 Taxman 191 ( Bom) (HC) Editorial: Keihin Fie ( P) Ltd v. ACIT ( 2015) 57 taxmann.com 287 ( Pune ) (Trib) is affirmed

S.92C: Transfer pricing – Comparable- While deterring ALP of components and parts exported to AE which are used in manufacturing of two wheelers cannot be compared with sale of finished goods in domestic market.

ITO v. Estate of Maharaja Karni Singh Bikaner ( 2018) 64 ITR 21 / 166 DTR 29/ 193 TTJ 451( Jodhpur) (Trib)

S.50C: Capital gains – Full value of consideration – Stamp valuation- When the assessee is protesting the valuation by Stamp authority and requesting the refer to Department volition Officer , the AO is bound to make the reference to Department Valuation Officer , accordingly the deletion of addition was held to be justified . [ S.45 ]