S. 4 : Charge of income-tax – Capital or revenue -Sales tax subsidy – Purpose of sales tax subsidy scheme was to attract people to invest and take part in industrialization of certain areas in the State, either by setting up new unit or expanding existing unit – Subsidy was a non-taxable capital receipt. [S. 28(i)]

S. 260A : Appeal – High Court – Place of assessment –Pilot employed by the Indian Airlines-Jurisdiction- Transfer of case -Reassessment -Residing in Mumbai and assessed in Hyderabad — Reassessment notices in Mumbai and Hyderabad — Participating in assessment proceedings in Hyderabad — Objection to reassessment notice issued in Mumbai cannot be raised for first time before High Court — Assessment proceedings is held to be valid. [S. 120(3) 124, 127, 143(3), 147, 148]

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty – Concealment -International transaction — Transfer pricing —Explanation of Arm’s length price is found to be bona fide—Penalty cannot be imposed- Explanation 7. [S. 92C]

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal – Duties- Reasoned speaking order which is the mandate as laid down by the Supreme Court in Kranti Associates Pvt Ltd v. Masood Ahmed Khan ( 2010) 9SCC 496 and Canara Bank v. V.K Awasthy (2005) SC 2090-Non speaking orders by Tribunal as well as Commissioner (E)- Natural justice is violated matter remitted to Commissioner (E) for fresh consideration.[S. 12AA]

S. 246A : Appeal – Commissioner (Appeals) – Appealable orders –Income from other sources – Cash credits -Assessee filing writ petition—Writ Court interpreting statutory provisions in favour of revenue—Assessee cannot file statutory appeal thereafter. [Art. 226]

S. 234B : Interest – Advance tax – Salary income -An assessee whose income -tax liable to be deducted at source is not liable to pay advance tax and consequently not liable to pay interest u/s 234B(1). [S. 15, 192]

S. 147 : Reassessment—Alternative remedy- Share premium-Notice based on information — Reasons for notice furnished to assessee—Writ petition against the notice is not maintainable [ S. 68,148, Art .226 ]

S. 147 : Reassessment -Reason to believe -Based on decision of Tribunal accepting contention of Assessee’s son in his case that income was chargeable in assessee’s hands as first holder of investments in mutual funds—Formation of belief is within subjective satisfaction of Assessing officer- Notice for reopening of assessment is valid. [S. 148]

S. 147 : Reassessment—Shell companies–Bogus long term capital gains-Assessment under S.143(1)-Notice of reassessment based on information from departmental channels-Assessing Officer had no occasion to form opinion- pinion—Reassessment is held to be valid. [S. 10 (38), 45, 143(1), 148]

S. 147 : Reassessment—Doctrine of merger—Annulment of reassessment proceedings was held as invalid -The original assessment order would automatically get restored-Doctrine of merger does not apply. [S. 143(3), 148]