Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


DCIT v. VSB Investment Pvt. Ltd. (2018) 61 ITR 16 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 147: Reassessment- Reassessment on the basis of information received from investigation wing for alleged accommodation entries and denial by parties the reopening was held to be bad in law [ S. 148 ]

Ambrish Manoj Dhupelia. v. DCIT (2018 ) 168 ITD 407 (SMC) (Mum) (Trib.)

S.147: Reassessment- Failure to disclose beneficial owner of deposits in foreign Bank accounts -Reassessment was held to be justified [ S.69 , 148 ]

Way 2 Wealth Brokers P. Ltd. v. (2018)61 ITR 259 (Bang) (Trib)

S.147: Reassessment — Issue was not considered in the original assessment proceedings hence reassessment was held to be valid. As regard the allowability of depreciation on stock exchange membership the matter was remanded .[ S. 32, 148 ]

CIT v. Jandu Construction Co. (2018) 61 ITR 235 (Chand) (Trib)

S. 147: Reassessment — Reopening on same issues as considered in rectification proceedings earlier was held to be not valid [ S. 148 ]

Veer Vardhman Finance Investment Pvt. LTD. v. DCIT (2018) 61 ITR 669 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 147: Reassessment — Non-speaking order disposing of Assessee’s objection against reassessment — Reassessment was held to be invalid [ S.68, 148 ]

Ramesh Salecha HUF v. ITO (2018) 61 ITR 632 (Mum) (Trib)

S. 147: Reassessment — Failure to issue notice u/s 143(2) , reassessment was held to be in valid [ S. 143(2) , 148 , 292BB]

DCIT v. Century Textiles And Industries Ltd. (2018) 61 ITR 647/ 162 DTR 247 /191 TTJ 483 (Mum) (Trib)

S. 147 : Reassessment –With in four years-Derived from- Export benefits – Decision of the Supreme Court was operative when the return was filed – Reassessment was held to be valid [ S. 80IC, 148 ]

Meta Plast Engineering P. Ltd. v. ITO ( Delhi)(Trib) , www.itatonline.org

S. 147: Reassessment – Bogus accommodation entries – Order was passed before expiry of four weeks of passing the orders of objection – Non application of mind while recording reasons – Order was held to be bad in law [ S. 148 ]

Sunrise Broking Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2018) 400 ITR 337 (Guj) (HC)

S. 147: Reassessment —Deemed dividend – Notice based on information received from another assessee’s assessing authority was held to be valid [ S. 2(22)( e ), 143(1), 148 ]

S.C. Johnson Products P. Ltd. v. ACIT (2018) 400 ITR 426/ 253 Taxman 108 / 161 DTR 209 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 147:Reassessment —Assessment of subsequent year showing that claims allowed in original assessments were based on erroneous statement by assessee — Reassessment notice was held to be valid [ S.148 ]