Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


Meta Plast Engineering P. Ltd. v. ITO ( Delhi)(Trib) , www.itatonline.org

S. 147: Reassessment – Bogus accommodation entries – Order was passed before expiry of four weeks of passing the orders of objection – Non application of mind while recording reasons – Order was held to be bad in law [ S. 148 ]

Sunrise Broking Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2018) 400 ITR 337 (Guj) (HC)

S. 147: Reassessment —Deemed dividend – Notice based on information received from another assessee’s assessing authority was held to be valid [ S. 2(22)( e ), 143(1), 148 ]

S.C. Johnson Products P. Ltd. v. ACIT (2018) 400 ITR 426/ 253 Taxman 108 / 161 DTR 209 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 147:Reassessment —Assessment of subsequent year showing that claims allowed in original assessments were based on erroneous statement by assessee — Reassessment notice was held to be valid [ S.148 ]

Alfa Investments. v. ITO (2018) 400 ITR 445/ 161 DTR 155 / 300 CTR 85 (Mad) (HC)Editorial: Affirmed by division Bench , Alfa Investments. v. ITO (2018) ( 2018) 304 CTR 425 ( Mad) (HC) Editorial: Affirmed by division Bench , Alfa Investments. v. ITO (2018) ( 2018) 304 CTR 425 ( Mad) (HC)

S. 147: Reassessment —Cash credits –No specific direction- Finding of the CIT(A) in assessment year , 2012-13 stating that the amount assessable in the years 2009-10 and 2010 -2011- Reassessment was held to be valid [ S. 68, 148 ]

Vijay Harishchandra Patel. v. ITO (2018) 400 ITR 167/ 167 DTR 475 (Guj) (HC)

S. 147: Reassessment — With in four years -Change of opinion- Reassessment was held to be not valid [ S. 148 ]

Krishna Developers and Co. v. DCIT (2018) 400 ITR 260 (Guj) (HC)Editorial: SLP of assessee is dismissed, Krishna Developers and Co. v. DCIT ( 2018) 254 Taxman 125 ( SC)

S. 147 : Reassessment –With in four years-Original assessment reassessment was held to be invalid for non service of notice u/s 143(2)- Notice reassessment on same ground was held to be valid .[ S.143(2), 148 ].

CIT v. Rajan N. Aswani ( 2018) 403 ITR 30 / 165 DTR 371 (Bom)(HC) , www.itatonline.org

S.147:Reassesment –With in four years-Audit objection- Reply of Assessing Officer to audit objection opposing the reassessment- , Apex court Judgement was not available- Reassessment was held to be bad in law . [ S. 80IB, 148 ]

Invensys Process Systems (S) v. ADIT (2018) 252 Taxman 199 (Uttarakhand) (HC)

S.147: Reassessment- Failure in computing income from outside India at a low rate – Reassessment was held to be valid [ S. 44BB, 148 ]

Kovalam Santhana Krishnan Mohan v. ITO (2018) 404 ITR 597/252 Taxman 289 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment – Order was passed without following the principle of natural justice , therefore the matter was remitted back to income tax officer for fresh consideration [ S.44AB, 45 ]

Dolphin Drilling Ltd. v. ADIT (2018) 401 ITR 209/ 252 Taxman 181 (Uttarakhand)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment –With in four years- Reassessment on basis of tangible material placed on record was held to be valid [ S.44BB(3), 92CA ]