Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


Denso India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2018) 167 DTR 73/ 193 TTJ 432 (Delhi)( Trib.)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s Length Price-Payment of application cost-TNMM method–TPO adopted CUP method and determined nil–Separate bench marking is required–Receipt for services-Addition was made without examining the provision of S.37(1)–Matter remanded.

Friends Alloys v. ACIT (2018) 163 DTR 273 / 192 TTJ 494 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 80IC : Special category States-substantial expansion-Entitle to deduction. [S. 80IB (5), 80IC(7)]

Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Company Ltd. v. ACIT . (2018) 170 DTR 22 / 195 TTJ 166 (Chennai) (Trib.)

S. 44 : Insurance business-Sale of investments-Held to be taxable. [S. 14A]

Firstsource Solutions Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2018) 168 DTR 161 / ( 2019) 197 TTJ 486 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 40A(2) : Expenses or payments not deductible–Excessive or unreasonable–Rent-No written agreement-Both are paying same rate of taxes-Revenue neutral- No disallowance can be made– Rent paid to sister concern–Matter remanded for verification.

Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Company Ltd v. ACIT (2018) 170 DTR 22 / 195 TTJ 166 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident–Re-insurance Premium-Profit of non-resident re-insurance company was taxable in India-liable to deduct tax. [Insurance Act 1938, S.2(9),114A ]

Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Company Ltd. v. ACIT (2018) 170 DTR 22 / 195 TTJ 166 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Compensation payable-Unascertainable liability-Not allowable as deduction.[S. 145]

Firstsource Solutions Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2018) 168 DTR 161 /( 2019) 197 TTJ 486(Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Provision of various expenses- Following the rule of consistency and accounting principle– Addition was deleted. [S. 145]

Firstsource Solutions Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2018) 168 DTR 161/( 2019) 197 TTJ 486 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure–Apportionment of expenses–STP unit and non -STP unit–Matter remanded.

NMDC Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2017) 190 TTJ 757 / (2018) 162 DTR 114 (Hyd.) (Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Demurrage charges-Held to be allowable-Corporate responsibility and expenditure commission- Held to be not allowable as no details were filed.

Dheeraj Consultancy (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2018) 168 DTR 52 / 193 TTJ 638 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Finance cost-Advertising agency-Held to be not allowable as revenue expenditure as no business income was earned from advertising business or real estate business during the year. [S. 37(1)]