S. 50C : Capital gains – Full value of consideration – Stamp valuation – Assessee neither objected to value determined by Sub-Registrar nor requested the AO for referring to Valuation Officer – AO was justified in bringing to tax deemed sale consideration as per the Stamp duty authority instead of the actual sale consideration claimed by assessee- AO can not invoke provisions of S. 50C(2) suo motu.[ S.45 , 50C(2) ]

S.45: Capital gains- Capital asset- Report of Tehsildar about exact location of land – Certificate from Gram Panchayat could not take precedence over the report of the Tehsildar who was the appropriate land revenue authority to assessee the nature of and location of land -Tehsildar is a Govt official, assessee cannot complain that he was not given an opportunity of cross examination- Land is held to be assessable as capital asset [ S. 2(14) ]

S.40(a)(ia):Amounts not deductible – Deduction at source – Tax on payment duly paid by recipient and receipt reflected in return — AO was directed to decide a fresh -Shipping expenses and freight and forwarding charges — AO was directed to decide a fresh [ S.172, 201(IA) ]

S.40(a)(ia):Amounts not deductible – Deduction at source- Cash payments to temporary data entry operators below prescribed limit for deduction of tax at source — Disallowance was held to be not justified .

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India –Non -resident – Royalty -Wireless agreement with Tata and Reliance – Burden is on revenue to prove taxability in India -Not taxable in India-DTAA- India -USA- [ Art ,12 (7)(b) ]

S. 271D: Penalty – takes or accepts any loan or deposit- Representative of the assessee consented to the proposition that apart from the bona fides of the transaction, assessee is also required to prove the existence of reasonable cause to come within the immunity provided in S. 273B of the Act, Accordingly the Tribunal has not dealt with any further with the reservations expressed by the Division Bench in the reference note. Accordingly on facts the assessee has failed to show that there was a reasonable cause for getting loans in violation of the provisions of S. 269SS of the Act . Levy of penalty is held to be justified . [ S.269SS, 273B ]

S.254(1): Appellate Tribunal –Additional claim-Block assessment -The fact that the second proviso to S. 158BC(a) prohibits an assessee who is subjected to search from filing a revised return of income does not mean that the assessee is prohibited from raising an additional claim before the appellate authorities [ S.158BC ]

S. 252 :Appellate Tribunal – Appointment of Tribunal Members under new rules – Persons selected as Member of the Appellate Tribunal will continue till the age of 62 years and the person holding the post of President, shall continue till the age of 65 years.

S. 147: Reassessment-If the recorded reasons do not specify, prima-facie, the quantum of tax which has escaped assessment but merely state that it would be at least Rs.1,00,000, and if the reopening is to “verify” suspicious transactions, prima-facie, the reasons do not indicate reasonable belief of the AO and the notice is without jurisdiction-Interim stay was granted till final hearing . [ S.148 ]

S. 143(2) : Assessment – Notice -Reassessment- If the notice u/s 143(2) is issued prior to the furnishing of return by the assessee in response to notice u/s 148, the notice issued u/s 143(2) is not valid and the reassessment framed on the basis of said notice has to be quashed. S. 292BB does not save the assessment [ S.147) 148, 292BB ]