Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


Dinesh Kumar Goyal v. ITO (2025) 482 ITR 909 (Cal)HC)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Outstanding tax-Notice of demand-Non-consideration of repeated representations for updating of challans-Direction to consider representations for updating of challans within four weeks-Direction to intimate action taken to assessee within one week from date of such action taken.[S. 156, Art. 226]

Senthil Murugan Jewellers v. ACIT [2023] 152 taxmann.com 534 / (2025) 482 ITR 803 (Mad)(HC)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Alternate remedy-Dispute regarding finding of fact-Writ petition dismissed. [S.246A. Art. 226]

Chatursinh Javanji Chavda v. ACIT (2024] 162 taxmann.com 466 / (2025) 482 ITR 245 (Guj)(HC)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Order passed without considering the reply of the assessee-Assessment order and demand notice was set aside-Directed to pass an order after considering the reply of assessee and after providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing.[S. 143(2), 144B, 147, 148, Art. 226]

Mitsubishi Corporation. v. ACIT [2024] 165 taxmann.com 79 / (2025) 482 ITR 230 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 143(3) :Assessment order-Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Additional grounds-Revised return-Assessed income below the returned income-Assessing 0fficer cannot deny the deduction relying on the Circular No 549 dt. 30-10-1989 (1990) 182 ITR (St.) 1)-DTAA-India-Japan. [S.9(1)(i), 254(1),Art. 5, 7, Art. 226]

Santosh Kumar Jha v. Dy. CIT (2025) 482 ITR 211 (Patna)(HC)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Failure to produce purchase of material-Scam-Siphoned off funds received from State Government for flood relief-Order of Tribunal disallowing the claim is affirmed. [S. 260A]

Angusamy Gounder Subbu Rathinamun v.ACIT (2025) 482 ITR 819 (Mad)(HC)

S. 143(2): Assessment-Notice-Order passed after giving proper notice under section 143(2) and adequate opportunity of being heard to assessee-Order valid.[Art. 226]

Kerala State Electronics Development Corporation v. ACIT (2025) 482 ITR 885 (Ker)(HC)

S. 139 : Return of income-Defect not rectified-Return invalid-Order of rejection u/s 264 is affirmed. [S.44A,139(9), 264, Art. 226]

Sindhu Shree Charles v. PCIT (2025) 482 ITR 625 (Mad)(HC)

S. 127 : Power to transfer cases-Failure to give an opportunity of hearing-Transfer of case not valid. [Art. 226]

Gaurangbhai Chimanbhai Kapadiya v. UOI [2024] 161 taxmann.com 304 / (2025) 482 ITR 649 (Guj)(HC)

S. 119 : Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Carry forward of losses-Assessee must prove genuine hardship-Rejection of application for condonation of delay was affirmed. [S.139(1), 139(3), Art. 226]

Abhilash Panda v. ITO (2025) 482 ITR 326 (Orissa)(HC)

S. 119 : Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Return-Condonation of delay-Rejection of application for condonation of delay without following guidelines-Not valid. [S. 139, Art. 226]