Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


Sri Krishna Tiles and Potteries (Madras) Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (2025) 477 ITR 595 /175 taxmann.com 883 (Mad)(HC) Sri Krishna Tiles and Potteries (Madras) Pvt. Ltd. v. CWT (2025) 477 ITR 595 /175 taxmann.com 883 (Mad)(HC) Editorial : Decision of single judge in CWT v. ITSC ( 2021) 435 ITR 583 ( Mad)( HC)), reversed.

S. 245D : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases-Procedure – Application-Single judge allowing writ petition filed by Commissioner of Wealth-tax and Commissioner of Income-tax against order under section 245D(4) passed by Settlement Commission No allegation that decision of Settlement Commission not in accordance with provisions of Act or based on bias, fraud and malice-Order of single judge in writ petition set aside-Blackstonian theory- Precedent Retrospective application of later judicial decision theory-Decision rendered later would have retrospective effect clarifying legal position which was earlier not correctly understood.[S. 245B(3), 245D(4) Art. 226]

Sant Lal and others. v. ITSC (2025) 477 ITR 422 (P&H)(HC) Editorial : SLP of assessee dismissed, Hari Chand an. v. ITSC (2025) 477 ITR 429 (SC)

S. 245D : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases-Return of income-Delay in filing of return – waiver of interest-Delayed filing of return as of copies of documents seized by Department not supplied in time to assessee-Cause for delay accepted by Settlement Commission-Settlement Commission reducing interest to 50 per cent.-No reasons assigned for partial reduction of interest-Complete waiver warranted when circumstances beyond assessee’s control Income- Advance tax- Seizure of cash not related to payment of advance tax-Settlement Commission right in refusing to waive interest for default in payment of advance tax. [S.220(2), 234B, 234C, 245D(4), Art. 226]

Hari Chand and Ors v. ITSC (2025) 477 ITR 429 (SC) Editorial : Refer, Sanat Lal v.ITSC (2025) 477 ITR 422 ( P& H)( HC)

S. 245D : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases-Advance tax-Interest-Search and seizure-Seizure of cash not related to payment of advance tax High Court holding Settlement Commission right in refusing to waive interest for default in payment of advance tax – SLP of assesseee dismissed. [S. 234B. 234C, 245D(4), Art. 136]

Fcbulka Advertising Pvt. Ltd v. ACIT (2025) 477 ITR 639 /174 taxmann.com 340 (Bom)(HC)

S. 237 : Refunds-Dividend distribution tax – Income-tax Refund order Essential factors Order must reflect conclusive and final- Preliminary or prima facie opinion not sufficient. Communication not demonstrating full and final satisfaction regarding entitlement to No breach of article 265 of Constitution where refund not conclusively determined Refund cannot be granted based on such communication. Fresh adjudication ordered. [Art. 265]

Baso Devi. v. CBDT [2024] 161 taxmann.com 17 / (2025) 477 ITR 382 (P & H) (HC)

S. 234A : Interest-Default in furnishing return of income-Waiver of interest- Return filed voluntarily after receipt of letter from Assessing Officer-Delay owing to old age of assessee and assessee being illiterate-Factors can be treated as unavoidable circumstances-Waiver must be granted-Notification dated 23-5-1966(1997) 235 ITR 101 ( St ) [S. 119(2), 139, 234B, 234C,Art. 226]

Dugar Indvent Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 477 ITR 278 (Telengana)(HC)

S. 151A: Face less assessment scheme-Notices issued and orders passed outside purview of Jurisdictional Assessing Officer in faceless mechanism and hence set aside-Revenue given liberty in accordance with new procedure on outcome of Supreme Court decision in pending special leave petition on similar issue.[147, 148, 148A(b),148A(d), 151A, Art. 226]

Sharda Devi Chhajer. v. ITO (2025) 477 ITR 228 (Raj)(HC)

S. 151A: Face less assessment scheme-Notices issued by jurisdictional Assessing Officer quashed and set aside-In a taxing statute, one has to look at the text as it is. There is no equity in taxation law. There is no intendment and presumption as to tax-Nothing is to be read in and nothing is to be implied- Revenue granted liberty to issue fresh notices in compliance with Central Board of Direct Taxes circular read with section 151A of the Act – Interpretation of taxing statue-term “randomly”. [S. 147, 148, 148A(b) 148A(d), Art. 226, 265]

Bank of India v. ACIT (2025) 477 ITR 208/170 taxmann.com 422 (Bom)(HC)

S. 151A: Face less assessment scheme-Notice under section 148 issued by jurisdictional Assessing Officer instead of Faceless Assessing Officer-Non-compliance with provisions of section 151A-Banking business-Capital or revenue Purchase of securities-Broken period interest-Allowable revenue expenditure-Audit objection-Notice invalid.[S. 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art.226]

Ravindra Pratap Shahi v. UOI (2025) 477 ITR 490 (All)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Information found recorded in coded electronic books of account of searched party – No scrutiny assessment – Reassessment notice is valid – Limitation-Quantum of escapement of income Limitation for assessment year 2017-2018 existing beyond 31-3-2021- Reassessment proceedings within prescribed time limit of six or ten years.[S. 147, 148, 148A(d), 153, Art. 226]

Alankar Apartments Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT [2024] 169 taxmann.com 682 / (2025) 477 ITR 399 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice – Diversion of loan- Proceedings continued under section 148A pursuant to direction of Supreme Court in UOI v. Ashish Agarwal( 2022) 444 ITR 1 (1) (SC) – Reassessment proceedings held to be valid. [S. 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]