Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


SK. Jaynal Abddin v. CIT (2024) 339 CTR 120 /161 taxmann.com 640 (Cal.) (HC)

S. 40A(3) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits-Payment to supervisors-Disbursement to workers-Payment made by the supervisors had not exceeded Rs. 20,000 to any individual labour-Disallowance is directed to be deleted.[S. 260A, R. 66DD(i), Indian Contract Act, S. 182, 185, 186, 188, 211]

A.M. Enterprises. v. State of Jharkhand (2024) 338 CTR 497 (Jharkhand) (HC)

S. 276B : Offences and prosecutions-Failure to pay to the credit tax deducted at source-Deposit of tax deducted at source before initiation of prosecution proceedings along with interest-No penalty proceeding is initiated-Criminal proceedings are quashed. [S. 278B]

Sarda Paper Ltd. v. PCIT (2024) 338 CTR 501/ 61 taxmann.com 362 (Bom)(HC)

S. 264: Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Assessment order passed by Dy. CIT, CPC-CPC only acts as a facilitator to the JAO and merely because the return is processed by CPC the regular jurisdiction of the JAO is not curtailed and he continues to hold the jurisdiction-Order dt. 25th March, 2022 is quashed and set aside-Principal CIT-5 is directed to dispose assessee’s application in accordance with law. [S. 120, 143(1), 143(2), Art. 226]

PCIT v. Milestone Gears (P) Ltd. (2024) 338 CTR 959/ 162 taxmann.com 472 (HP)(HC)

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Delay of 224 days-No valid explanation was mentioned in the application-Appeal is dismissed. [S. 254(1)]

Bhatewara Associates v. ITAT (2024) 338 CTR 846 / 162 taxmann.com 834 (Bom)(HC)

S. 254(2): Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Tribunal is not an authority-Tribunal failed to appreciate the spirit in which the order dt. 23rd Aug., 2022 was passed by the High Court-Delay is condoned-Assessment order is quashed and directed the Assessing Officer to pass the order in accordance with law. [S.80IB(10),119(2)(b), Art. 226]

Antony Sunny v. CIT (A)(2024) 338 CTR 757 (Ker) (HC) Editorial : Order of single judge is set aside, Antony Sunny v. CIT (A) (2024) 338 CTR 759 (Ker) (HC)

S. 249 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Form of appeal and limitation-Delay of 115 days in preferring appeal-Appeal was dismissed-Writ was dismissed. [S. 246A, 249(3), Art.226]

Antony Sunny v. CIT (A) (2024) 338 CTR 759 (Ker) (HC) Editorial : Order of single bench is set aside, Antony Sunny v. CIT (A) (2024) 338 CTR 759 (Ker) (HC)

S. 249 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Form of appeal and limitation-Delay of 115 days in preferring appeal-Appeal was dismissed-Writ was dismissed by single judge bench-On appeal the delay was condoned and CIT(A) is directed to decide on merits.[S. 246A, 249(3), Art.226]

Sar Senapati Santaji Ghorpade Sugar Factory Ltd. v. ACIT (2024) 338 CTR 167 /338 CTR 167 / 470 ITR 723(Bom) (HC)

S. 245C : Settlement Commission-Fixing the last date for filing of application-When the Department has extended the last date from 1st Feb., 2021 to 30th Sept., 2021, it can only extend the deadline but cannot introduce a new concept of eligibility as on 1st Feb., 2021 which is not there in the Act itself-Condition imposed by the Notification dt. 28 th September, 2021 of CBDT is invalid and bad in law-Petitioner has the right to approach the Settlement Commission. [S.119(2)(b), 245C (5), Art. 226]

Shyam Oil Extractions (P) Ltd. v PCIT (2024) 338 CTR 91 / 159 taxmann.com 555 (Chhattisgarh)(HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Recovery-Stay-Waiver of pre-deposit of 20 per cent tax-Pendency of appeal before CIT(A)-Installment is granted by PCIT-On writ the assessee has not substantiate genuine hardship by placing materials or evidence-Writ petition is dismissed. [S. 220(6), 246, Art. 226]

Anvil Cables (P) Ltd. v State of Jharkhand (2024) 338 CTR 935 (Jharkhand)(HC)

S. 201 : Deduction at source-Failure to deduct or pay-Contractors-Non-deposit of tax deducted at source and no-refund to the deductee with the interest-Court also directed the managing director to pay cost of 5 lakhs to the petitioner. [S. 194C,203 Art. 226]