Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


CIT (IT) v. UMW Sher (L) Ltd. (2024)299 Taxman 67(Delhi)(HC) Editorial : UMW Sher (L) Ltd v. CIT (IT) (2023) 199 ITD 692 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 44BB : Mineral oils-Computation-Non-resident-Royalty-supply/lease/hire of rigs to be used for drilling and exploration of mineral oils-Amount received is covered under provisions of section 44BB and taxable on gross/presumptive basis at rate of 10 per cent-DTAA-India-Malaysia.[S.9(1)(vi), 115A, 260A, art. 12]

CIT v. Bhartiya Hotels (P.) Ltd. (2024) 299 Taxman 510 / 465 ITR 230 (SC) Editorial: CIT v. Bhartiya Hotels (P.) Ltd(2022) 143 taxmann.com 70 /( 2024)465 ITR 227 (Cal)(HC)

S. 40A(3) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits-Delay of 521 days-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [Art. 136]

CIT v. Shree Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. (2024) 299 Taxman 450 /338 CTR 378 (SC) Editorial: CIT v. Shree Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd (2011) 10 taxmann.com 609 (Bom)(HC)

S. 40A(2) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Excessive or unreasonable-Matter remanded back to the Assessing Officer. [S. 37(1), 40A(2)(a), Art. 136]

PCIT v. JAS Forwarding (P.) Ltd. (2024) 299 Taxman 236 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Fes for technical services-Reimbursement of expenses-Revenue had failed to establish that said remitted fee would fall within ambit of any technical, managerial or consultative service that had been rendered-Not liable to deduct tax at source-Order of Tribunal deleting the disallowance is affirmed-OECD Model Convention, art 7. [S.9(1)(vi), 195, 260A]

PCIT v. Hike (P.) Ltd. (2024) 299 Taxman 178 / 299 Taxman 447/ 464 ITR 394 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. Hike (P.) Ltd. (2024) 158 taxmann.com 162/ 462 ITR 183 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Purchase of software-Not necessary that income must be earned because of such expenditure-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 28(i), Art. 136]

PCIT v. Trigent Software Ltd. (2024) 299 Taxman 453 / 464 ITR 770 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. Trigent Software Ltd(2023) 147 taxmann.com 52/ 457 ITR 765 (Bom)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Software development solution and management-Capital or revenue-Software abandoned-Work in progress-SLP of Revenue is dismissed.[Art. 136]

CIT v. Nirma Ltd. (2024) 299 Taxman 180 (SC) Editorial : CIT v. Nirma Ltd (2015) 229 Taxman 535 (Guj)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Expansion of existing business-Revenue expenditure-Tax effect is below threshold limits-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 268A, Art. 136]

PCIT v. Vishaldeep Spinning Mills Ltd. (2024) 299 Taxman 368 / 465 ITR 530 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. Vishaldeep Spinning Mills Ltd(2023) 153 taxmann.com 372 / (2024) 465 ITR 524 (Guj)(HC)

S. 32 : Depreciation-Carry forward and set off-Unabsorbed depreciation pertaining to assessment year 1997-98 could be allowed to be carried forward and set off after a period of eight years without any limit whatsoever in accordance with section 32(2) as amended by Finance Act, 2001-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 32(2), Art. 136]

PCIT v. M.P. Entertainment and Developers (P.) Ltd. (2024) 299 Taxman 211 (MP)(HC)

S. 28(i) : Business income-Rental income-Sub-letting of mall could not be assessed as income from house property and same was to be assessed as income from business. [S. 22]

Sanjay Baweja v. Dy. CIT (2024) 299 Taxman 313/341 CTR 376 / 241 DTR 145 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 17(2) : Salary-Perquisite-Stock options were merely held by assessee and same had not been exercised till date, same would not constitute income chargeable to tax in hands of assessee as none of contingencies specified in section 17(2)(vi) had occurred-Payment in question was not linked to employment, rather it was a onetime voluntary payment to all option holders of ESOP, compensation would not tantamount to perquisite under section 17(2)(vi) of the Act.[S.17(2)(vi), 197, Art. 226]