Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


All India Bank Officers’ Confederation v. Regional Manager, Central Bank of India (2024) 299 Taxman 93 / 464 ITR 286/338 CTR 505 (SC) Editorial : All India Punjab National Bank Officer’s Association v. Chairman-cum-Managing Director Punjab National Bank (2010) 190 Taxman 221/ 321 ITR 324 (MP)(HC)/ All India Union Bank Officers Federation v. UOI (2016) 240 Taxman 92/ 385 ITR 114 (Mad)(HC), affirmed.

S. 17(2) : Salary-Perquisite-Employer’s grant of interest-free loans or loans at concessional rate would qualify as a ‘fringe benefit’ and ‘perquisite’ as understood through its natural usage in common parlance-Enactment of subordinate legislation for levying tax on interest-free/concessional loans as a fringe benefit is within rule making power under section 17(2)(viii) and enactment of rule 3(7)(i) is not a case of excessive delegation and falls within parameters of permissible delegation. Rule 3(7)(i) is intra vires section 17(2)(viii) and therefore, section 17(2)(viii) does not lead to an excessive delegation of ‘essential legislative function’ to CBDT-Fixation of SBI’s rate of interest, i.e., PLR, as benchmark to determine value of benefit to assessee in comparison to rate of interest charged by other individual banks under rule 3(7)(i) is neither an arbitrary nor unequal exercise of power and is intra vires article 14 of constitution of India. [S.17(2)(viii), Rule 3(7)(i), Art. 14, 136]

CIT v. Young Scholar’s Educational Society (2024) 299 Taxman 145/341 CTR 52 /242 DTR 252/ 471 ITR 164 (P&H)(HC)/CIT v. Baba Banda Singh Bahadur Education Trust (2024) 341 CTR 52 /242 DTR 252 /299 Taxman 145 / 471 ITR 164 8 NYPCTR 889 (P&H)(HC)

S. 12AA : Procedure for registration-Trust or institution-Cancellation of registration-Commissioner had no jurisdiction to cancel registration certificate once granted by him to assessee under section 12A till 1-10-2004 [S. 12A, 260A]

Indian Merchants Chamber v. ACIT (2024) 299 Taxman 62 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 10(23C) : Charitable institution-Promoting, advancing and protecting trade, commerce and industry in India–Matter was remanded to Chief Commissioner for de novo consideration by applying law as laid down by Tribunal.Matter remanded. [S. 2(15), 10(23C)(iv), Art. 226]

CIT (E) v. India Trade Promotion Organization (2024) 299 Taxman 454/338 CTR 875 (SC) Editorial : CIT (E) v. India Trade Promotion Organisation (2023)454 ITR 799 / 294 taxman 1 (SC)

S. 10(23C) : Educational institution-Charitable purpose-Order of High Court affirmed-SLP of Revenue is dismissed-Delay of 247b days-Review petition is dismissed on account of delay as well as on merits. [S. 2(15), 10(23C)(iv), Art. 136]

CIT v. MOL Corporation (2024) 299 Taxman 506(SC) Editorial: CIT (IT)) v. MOL Corporation (2024) 162 taxmann.com 197 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Fees for technical services-Sale of software-Subscription fees-Order of High Court is affirmed-SLP of Revenue is dismissed-DTAA-India-USA [S.9(1)(vii), art. 12, Art. 136]

Johnson Matthey Public Ltd. Comapany v. CIT(IT) (2024) 299 Taxman 334 /465 ITR 649 (Delhi)(HC)/Editorial : SLP of assessee is dismissed , Johnson Matthey Public Ltd. Co. v. CIT (IT) (2024) 469 ITR 31 (SC)

S. 9(1)(v) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Interest-Other income-Guarantee to various banks to extend credit facilities to its Indian subsidiaries-Guarantee charges were not received by assessee in respect of any debt owed to it by its Indian subsidiary-Guarantee fee would not fall within expression ‘interest’ in article 12 of India UK DTAA-Accrue-Arise-Income-DTAA-India-UK-Northern Ireland / [S. 2(28A), 5(2), 260A, art.7, 12(5), 23(3)]

CIT v. Mitsui & Co. Ltd. (2024) 299 Taxman 365(SC) Editorial : CIT (IT) v.Mitsui & Co. Ltd (2024) 161 taxmann.com 634 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Liaison Office-Non-Resident company-Did not finalize and transact a business deal and activities-Liaison Office could not be said to be preparatory or auxiliary in nature, LO did not constitute Permanent Establishment of assessee-MIPL was not performing additional function, in absence of material, it could not be taken as dependant agency PE to assessee, a non-resident company-Delay of 395 days-SLP of Revenue is dismissed on account of delay as well as on merits-DTAA-India-Japan [art. 5, Art. 136]

PCIT (Central) v. Pepsico India Holding (P.) Ltd. (2024) 299 Taxman 309 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Subsidy-Capital or revenue-Bengal Incentive Scheme, 2004-Linked to establishment of new units-Capital in nature.[S.28(i)]

PCIT v. INS Finance & Investment (P.) Ltd. (2024) 299 Taxman 131 / 340 CTR 602/(2025) 475 ITR 83 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Interest-Capital or revenue-Auction sale-Interest against principal amount deposited-Auction sale is nullified by court-Interest is capital receipt and cannot be assessed as income from other sources.[S. 56(2)(viii)]

Birla Corporation Ltd. v. CIT (2024) 299 Taxman 508 (SC) Editorial : CIT v. Birla Corporation Ltd(2024) 159 taxmann.com 651 (Cal)(HC)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Capital or revenue Sales tax exemption-Notice is issued in SLP filed by the assesseee. [U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948, S. 4A, Art. 136]