S. 68: Cash credits-Discharged the initial burden-Order of High Court affirmed-SLP of revenue dismissed. [Art. 136]

S. 68: Cash credits-Long-term capital gains-Sale of shares-Mishka Finance & Trading Ltd-Penny stock-Commission-SEBI inquiry finding no violations and assessee furnishing complete supporting evidence-Transactions were held genuine-Tribunal deleted additions-High Court affirmed the order of the Tribunal-SLP of the revenue was dismissed on account of delay of 154 days. [S. 10(38), 45, 69C, Art . 136]

S. 45: Capital gains-Capital asset-Agricultural land-Exemption claimed without cogent evidence-Description in revenue records as dry land suitable for construction-Assessable as capital gains-SLP dismissed. [S. 2(14)(iii), Art.136]

S. 44BB: Mineral oils-Computation-Income-Deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalties or Fees for Technical Services-Mineral Oil Exploration Services-The matter was remanded to the AO for fresh consideration of the royalty issue and passing of a fresh order in accordance with law. DTAA-India-Norway. [S. 9(1)(vii), 44DA, 197, Art. 12, Art. 226]

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Compensation-Year of allowability-Compensation is allowable in the year of actual payment and not in the year when liability crystallised. [S. 145]

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Broken period interest on purchase of securities-Securities held as stock-in-trade-Interest paid for broken period was allowable as deduction-SLP delay of 959 days-SLP dismissed on account of delay as well as on merits. [Art . 136]

S.37(1): Business expenditure-Management fees-Excessive-SLP of revenue dismissed on account of delay as well as on merits.[Art. 136]

S. 32: Depreciation-Block of assets-Disallowance of depreciation on the ground that certain units had not been put to use during the year under consideration-depreciation is allowable on the entire block, as attribution to specific units is unnecessary once assets fall within a block.[S. 2(11)]

S. 11: Property held for charitable purposes-Assessee advancing objects of general public utility carried on activities resulting in incidental surplus, and quantitative limit prescribed under second proviso to section 2(15) was adhered to; such activities continued to qualify as charitable for purposes of section 11 of the Act. [S. 2(15), 260A]

S. 11: Property held for charitable purposes-Providing systematic instructions or training which involves a process of teaching and learning amounts to “providing education” for purposes of section 2(15)-Mere generation of surplus would not be a ground to deny exemption to assessee under section 11 when the surplus so generated was used solely for educational purposes-Entitled to exemption. [S. 2(15), 12AA]