S. 271-I: Penalty-Deduction of tax at source-Remittances against import of goods-provision for withholding tax and requirement to furnish details not mandatory-forms 15CA and 15CB to be submitted only for payments chargeable to tax in India-Penalty not attracted for failure to furnish forms. [S. 195(6), Form,15CA,15CB,Rule 37BB]

S. 271D : Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Penalty could not be imposed after expiry of period of limitation.[S. 275(1)((c)]

S. 271C : Penalty-Failure to deduct at source-Tax deducted at source-Deposited with interest-Survey-Reasonable cause-Levy of penalty is not justified.[S.133A]

S. 271C : Penalty-Failure to deduct at source-Interest payable to Uttarakhand Environment Protection and Pollution Control Board on FDs with the assessee-Board not a taxable entity, established under Central Act-Penalty not leviable. [S. 194A(3)(iii)(f), Notification No. S. O. 3489(E), Dated 22-10-1970.]

S.271B: Penalty-Failure to get accounts audited-Delay in filing audit report due to change of tax auditor-Reasonable cause for delay-Penalty cannot be levied

S. 271B : Penalty-Failure to get accounts audited-Audit report filed along with the return-Levy of penalty is not justified.

S. 271D : Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Sale of flat-assessee collecting sale proceeds and also purchasing for daughter’s wedding-Failure on part of assessee reasonable-Words, “reasonable cause” and “Reasonable” to be taken into consideration as per 273B-Held, a penalty not to be imposed. [S. 273B]

S. 271(1)(c): Penalty-Concealment-Search-Search initiated on or after 1st June, 2007-Bogus purchases-Penalty in search cases cannot be levied u/s. 271(1)(c) for AY. 2012-13 .[S. 271AAA]

S. 271(1)(c): Penalty —Concealment-CIT (A) observed that assessee was subjected to pay taxes u/s 115JB,even after taking into consideration additions made in assessment order-held, with reference to cbdt circular no. 25 of 2015, dated 31.12.2015 penalty was not leviable-Order upheld. [S.115JB]

S. 271(1)(c): Penalty-Concealment-Transfer pricing adjustment-Application of filters and selection of comparables are debatable issues-not ground for levy of penalty-suo-moto disallowance of provision for doubtful debts-tribunal directed the ao to withdraw disallowance after verification-as addition did not survive-cancellation of penalty justified-denial of deduction u/s 10a-proposed in draft assessment order but deleted by drp-deduction allowed in full in final assessment order-penalty does not survive.