Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


Bombay Transport Co-Operative Consumer Society Ltd. v. ITO (2023) 101 ITR 72 (SN) (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Failure of AO to inquire loss on disposal of assets/expenditure-A.O. duty bound to disallow expenditure which is not of revenue expenditure in P & L account-Revision Justified.[S. 143(3)]

ADM Agro Industries Kota and Akola Pvt. Ltd. v. PCIT (2023)101 ITR 93 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-AO made enquiries-Contention of the PCIT that examination not done incorrect-Contention that A.O. had only one day to pass order invalid-Revision not Justified.[S. 143(3)]

Vijay Liladhar Mohmaya v. ITO (2023)101 ITR 33 (SN) (Mum)(Trib)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Limitation-Condonation of delay-Assessee’s CA expired-Assesssee made aware only upon intimation of penalty order-Assessee, a cardiac patient undergone treatment-Sufficient cause-Delay condoned.

Puran Pradhan v. ITO (2023)101 ITR 266 (Kol) (Trib)

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Condonation of delay-Delay on account of bona fide belief-No dilatory strategy-Delay condoned.[S. 254(1)]

Kanta Chandak (Smt).v ITO (2023)101 ITR 6 (Jodhpur) (Trib) Mohan Lal Chandak v. ITO 2023)101 ITR 6 (Jodhpur) (Trib)

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Appeal-Condonation of delay-Assessee an aged person, suffering from various illness-Omission to prefer appeal inadvertently-Reasonable Cause-Delay condoned.[S. 254(1)]

Play Games 24×7 P. Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2023)101 ITR 241 (Mum) (Trib)

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Delay in filing appeal-No condonation of delay application-No reasons explained by the department-Appeal barred by limitation.[S. 254(1)]

Dabur India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)101 ITR 148 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Appeal to appellate Tribunal-Power to admit additional evidence-Tribunal admitted in assessee’s own case for previous years-Empowered to admit claims other that by revised returns.[S. 254(1)]

MGS Securities P. Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2023)101 ITR 95 (SN)(Delhi) (Trib)

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Appeal by assessee-Assessee not putting appearance-Not adducing material before Tribunal to controvert findings-Order of CIT (A) justified.

Saranya Agro Foods Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2023)101 ITR 60 (SN)(Chennai)(Trib)

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-50 lakhs monetary limit for appeal by Department-Circular laying down limit applicable to retrospectively even to pending appeals. [CBDT Circular No. 17 Of 2019, Dated August 8, 2019]

Wieden+Kennedy India Pvt. Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2023)101 ITR 63 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure-CIT(A) cannot go beyond the assessment year other than the one under consideration-Direction to AO to take remedial action for other Assessment year not sustainable.[S. 28(i), 253]