Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


Umananda Rice Mill Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2023)101 ITR 140/ 148 taxmann.com 211 (Kol) (Trib)

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Documentation charges-Payment paid by assessee-Shown in return of receipts and taxes paid-Disallowance not warranted.[S. 194C]

Profarm Seed India P. Ltd. v. ITO (2023)101 ITR 120/ 198 ITD 113 (Hyd) (Trib)

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Business expenditure-Disallowance-Remuneration to directors-Prior to 01.04.2015-Deduction allowable-Audit fees-addition justified.

Play Games 24×7 P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)101 ITR 241 (Mum) (Trib)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Interest-Royalty-Fes for technical services-Advertisement expenses-Server for advertisement located outside India-No control with assessee over functioning of interface provided-No element of Fee for technical services or Royalties-Not liable to deduct tax at source. [S. 9(1)(vii), 195]

Matrimony.Com Ltd. v ACIT (2023)101 ITR 253 (Chennai) (Trib)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident –Royalty-Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Payment towards availing of facilities subject to placements of advertisements-Not for license or right to use-Not Royalty-Not liable to deduction of tax at source. [S.9(1)(vi), 195, 201 (1).

T. M. International Logistics Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)101 ITR 51 (SN)(Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Provision for royalty-Matter remanded-Educational cess-Not allowable as deduction. [S. 40(a)(ia)]

Wieden+Kennedy India Pvt. Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2023)101 ITR 63 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Money embezzled by director-CIT(A) accepted loss but denied deduction for want of details-AO to verify recovery and allow balance of loss.[S. 28(i)]

Matrimony.Com Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2023)101 ITR 253 (Chennai) (Trib)

S .37(1) : Business expenditure-Prior period expense-Reversal of income offered when finalising accounts for later years-Prior period income no to be taxed again-Matter remanded to avoid duplicity of additions.[S. 145]

Havells India Ltd. v. ACIT (LTU) (2023)101 ITR 81 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Provision for scheme not contingent-Made on scientific basis-Own orders in earlier years-No contrary findings-Addition to be deleted.

Praxair India P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023) 101 ITR 640 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Interest on foreign currency loan-Loss on fluctuation of rates-Foreign exchange gains offered to tax-loss arising of the same to also be allowed.[S. 28(i)]

Ganesh Ginning Factory v.Asst. CIT(2023)101 ITR 90 (SN) (Ahd) (Trib) Gajanand Ginning and Pressing Pvt. Ltd v. ITO (2023)101 ITR 90 (SN) (Ahd) (Trib) Premjibhai Vallabhbhai Kukadiya v. ITO (2023)101 ITR 90 (SN) (Ahd) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Debit of cash discount prior to crystalising during year and not in prior or subsequent year-Deduction allowable. [S. 145]