Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


PCIT v. Wadia Ghandy & Co(2023) 155 taxmann.com 228 (Bom)(HC) Editorial: PCIT v. Wadia Ghandy & Co. (2023) 295 Taxman 229 (SC). Availed of benefit under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, SLP of Revenue dismissed as infructuous.

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Amount paid to retiring partner as per the provision in partnership deed-Diversion of income at source by overriding title-Allowable as deduction. [S. 4]

CIT v. National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Ltd. (2023) 459 ITR 593 / 295 Taxman 122 (SC) Editorial: National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Ltd v.CIT (2017) 393 ITR 666/ 247 Taxman 338 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Method of accounting-Award-Interest payable-Award stayed-Not contingent-Order of High Court is affirmed-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 145]

PCIT v. Olam Exports India Ltd. (2023) 295 Taxman 312 (SC) Editorial: CIT v. Olam Exports India Ltd (2017) 398 ITR 397/ 85 taxmann.com 33 (Ker)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Sales commission-Order of High Court is affirmed-SLP of Revenue is dismissed.

PCIT v. Wadia Ghandy & Co. (2023) 295 Taxman 229 (SC) Editorial: PCIT v. Wadia Ghandy & Co(2023) 155 taxmann.com 228 (Bom)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Amount paid to retiring partner as per the provision in partnership deed-Diversion of income at source by overriding title-Allowable as deduction-Availed 2020-SLP of Revenue is dismissed as infructuous.[S. 4, Art. 136]

PCIT v. Eltek SGS (P.) Ltd. (2023) 457 ITR 733 / 295 Taxman 40 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 32 : Depreciation-Goodwill created as a result of Amalgamation-Intangible asset-Order of Tribunal allowing the depreciation is affirmed. [S.47, 49(1)(e), 55(2)]

PCIT v. Kuantum Papers Ltd. (2023) 295 Taxman 546/(2024)462 ITR 194 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 32 : Depreciation-Brand name-Intangible assets-Commercial rights-Depreciation is allowable. [S.32 (1)(ii)]

PCIT v. Gujarat Flurochemicals Ltd. (2023) 459 ITR 242/ 295 Taxman 200 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Mixed funds-Rule 8 would be attracted automatically is not correct-Disallowance cannot exceed exempt income.[R.8D]

PCIT v. Security Printing and Mining Corporation of India Ltd. (2023) 459 ITR 261/295 Taxman 732 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Not recording of satisfaction-Not examined the shared accounts-Order of Tribunal deleting the addition is affirmed.[R.8D, 260A]

CIT(E) v. Water & Land Management Training & Research Institute (2023) 295 Taxman 753/(2024) 461 ITR 1/337 CTR 252 (SC) Editorial: CIT (E) v. Water & Land Management Training & Research Institute (2017) 83 taxmann.com 234 /398 ITR 282(AP& Telengana (HC), affirmed./Refer , Water & Land Management Training & Research Institute v.DIT ( E ) (2015) 40 ITR 559(Hyd)( Trib)

S. 12AA : Procedure for registration-Trust or institution-Preservation of environment-Control of Irrigation Department of State Government-Registration was allowed-Order of High Court affirmed.[S. 2(15)]

CIT (IT) NET APP B V (2023) 155 taxmann.com 274 /(2024) 460 ITR 152 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial: CIT (IT) v. NET APP B V (2023) 295 Taxman 216/ 460 ITR 154 (SC)

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Fess for technical services-Computer software-Non-resident computer software manufacturers/suppliers-, Consideration for resale/use of computer software through EULAs/distribution agreement-Not payment of royalty for use of copyright in computer software-Not taxable in India-DTAA-India-Netherland-Appeal of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 9(1)(vii), 260A, Art. 12]