S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Long term capital gains from equities-Instances of insider trading-Formation of opinion based on prima facie, but precise facts-Strong foundation for invoking reassessment-Challenge to notice was dismissed.[S. 10(38), 45, 148, Art. 226]

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Transfer-Revaluation of asset-Estate development-Converted from inventory to fixed asset-Firm converted into company-Order of Tribunal quashing the reassessment was quashed. [S. 2(47), 45(1), 45(4),47(xiii), 148]

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Compensation expenditure-Survey-Capital or revenue-Reopening of assessment on mere change of opinion — Impermissible — Notice was quashed and set aside. [S. 37(1), 133A, 147, Art. 226]

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Share capital-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment order quashing the reassessment is affirmed. [S. 68, 143(3), 148, 260A]

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Consumption of leather-No suppression of material-Addition was deleted.

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Draft assessment order-Passing of final order-Contrary to law-Mistake could not be cured. [S. 156, 292B.]

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Long term capital gains-Violation of principle of natural justice-Allowing the time of 12 hours-Holiday-There was gross violation of principles of natural justice-The final assessment order was quashed.[S. 263, Art. 226]

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Neither draft assessment order nor show cause notice was issued-Assessing Officer was directed to initiate process from stage it was left by furnishing draft assessment order along with show cause notice-Matter remanded. [S. 143(3), Art. 226]

S. 119 : Central Board of Direct Taxes-Instructions-loss return-Condonation of delay of 36days-Affidavit of Charted Accountant-genuine-hardship-Delay in filing the of loss return was condoned. [S. 119(2)(b), 139, Art. 226]

S. 80IB(10) : Housing projects-Failure to complete the housing project-Delay due to dispute of jurisdiction between AMC and AUDA over issuance of BU permission and after resolution of same AMC issued permission before due date of 31-3-2012-Order of Tribunal is affirmed-Return was filed within extended period as required to get TP report-Order of Tribunal allowing the claim was affirmed. [S. 92E, 139(1), 260A]