S. 32 : Depreciation-Actual cost-Block of assets-Subsidy from State Government-Incentive to establish an industrial unit in the backward area-Employment generation-Capital receipt-No adjustment is warranted to reduce form the cost of acquisition. [S.2(11), 4, 43(1)]

S. 32 : Depreciation – Rate of depreciation – Computer accessories and peripherals – Entitle to depreciation at 60 percent.

S. 32 : Depreciation-Revaluation-Actual cost – Taken over assets and liabilities of the firm-Actual cost of assets will be actual cost which assessee paid to predecessor after revaluing assets-Entitled to claim depreciation for subsequent years on basis of actual cost paid. [S. 43(1), Proviso ,260AR. 5]

S. 28(i) : Business loss-Penny stock-Share trading-Information from investigation wing-VAS Infrastructure Ltd (VASIL)-Not black listed by SEBI-Order of Tribunal allowing the loss is affirmed. [S. 10(38), 45, 260A]

S. 28(i) : Business loss-Penny stock-Share trading-Information from investigation wing-VAS Infrastacture Ltd. (VASIL)-Not black listed by SEBI-Order of Tribunal allowing the loss is affirmed. [S. 10(38), 45, 260A]

S. 28(i) : Business loss – Marked-to-market Loss-On open equity tock future contracts-Forward contracts-Suffered on stock-In-Trade – Speculative transaction-Ascertained loss – Allowable as deduction-SLP of revenue is dismissed. – Supreme Court – Special Leave Petition Dismissed. [S. 37(1), 43 (5), 73]

S. 22 : Income from house property-Principle of mutuality-Matter remanded to the Tribunal for fresh decision. [S. 254(1), 260A]

S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-No exempt income earned-Question of law admitted.[R.8D, 260A]

S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Failure to record dissatisfaction-Not earned any exempt income-Order of Tribunal deleting the disallowance is affirmed. [S. 115JB, 260A, R.8D]

S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Strategic investments-Subsidarry companies, associate concerns and partnership firms-Restricted 5% of aggregate of expenditure-Order of Tribunal was quashed and set aside-a Assessing Officer was directed to pass an order in accordance with law and formula laid down in Maxopp Investment Ltd. v. CIT [2018] 254 Taxman325 / 402 ITR 640 (SC). [R. 8D, 260A]