Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


SP Armada Oil Exploration (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 238 TTJ 209 / 179 taxmann.com 196 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 92C: Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-No TP adjustment where consistent benchmarking was accepted in an earlier year. [S.92CA]

Shree Sthanak Vasi Jain Sanghji Vrajpark v. CIT (E) (2025) 238 TTJ 327 (Ahd.)(Trib.).

S. 80G: Donation-Composite charitable and religious trust-Approval cannot be denied if religious expenditure does not exceed 5%.-Matter was remanded. [S. 80G(5), 80G(5B)]

Sree Vishwabharathi Charitable Trust v. ITO (2025) 238 TTJ 828 / 178 taxmann.com 544 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 69C: Unexplained expenditure-Recorded expenditure cannot be taxed under section 69C [S. 143(3)]

DCIT v. Tirupati Matsup (P.) Ltd. (2025) 238 TTJ 465 / 125 ITR 715 / 177 taxmann.com 836 (Delhi)(Trib.).

S. 69C: Unexplained expenditure-Bogus purchases-Unverifiable Purchases-Only the profit element embedded in unverifiable purchases can be taxed and not the entire purchase amount-Estimation of 5% GP upheld. [S. 145(3)]

Rosha Alloys (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 238 TTJ 357 / 127 ITR 76 / 175 taxmann.com 622 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 69C: Unexplained expenditure-bogus purchases-Addition unsustainable where purchases, movement of goods and consumption are fully evidenced. [S. 145]

Estate Investment Company (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 238 TTJ 585 (Mum)(Trib).

S. 69A: Unexplained money-Search & seizure-Addition based solely on employee’s diary and retracted statements-Not sustainable. (S. 132, 132(4A) 153A)

Jamna Dass Nikkamal Jain Saraf (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 238 TTJ 473 (Chd.)(Trib.).

S. 69A: Unexplained money-Seized Papers-Where seized rough sheets substantially tally with the regular books of account, only unexplained differences can be sustained and not the entire addition. [S.132, 145(3)]

DCIT v. Santosh Trust (2025) 238 TTJ 237 / 178 taxmann.com 31 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 69A: Unexplained money-Cash deposits during demonetisation-Addition was deleted where source stood explained from regular books [S. 115BBE]

Suresh Kumar Banthia v. DCIT (2025) 238 TTJ 130 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 69A: Unexplained money-Survey-Addition based on dumb documents seized from third parties deleted.[S. 133A]

ACIT v. Chhattisgarh Distilleries Ltd. (2025) 238 TTJ 774 / 177 taxmann.com 257 (Raipur)(Trib.)

S. 69: Unexplained investments-Undisclosed Income-Loose papers-Addition based on dumb documents-Addition was deleted.[S.69C, 132, 153A]