Tribunal held that since the assessee had submitted certain additional evidences under rule 29, read with rule 18(4) which were not available before Assessing Officer/Commissioner (Appeals) for their perusal, matter was to be remanded for verification as well as examination of evidences furnished by assessee. Matter remanded. (AY. 2011-12, 2012-13)
Block Resources Coordinator Rajiv Gandhi Siksha Mission. v. ITO (TDS) (2024) 204 ITD 408 (Raipur) (Trib.)
S. 272A : Penalty-Failure to answer questions-Sign statements-Furnish information-Additional evidence-Matter remanded to the file of the Assessing Officer.[S.194C, 272A(2)(k)),R.18(4)]
Leave a Reply