Allowing the appeal of the assessee, the Court held that the exclusion of the three comparables for determination of arm’s length price under section 92CA merited acceptance. In so far as the two entities were concerned, the Tribunal had, in the assessee’s own case pertaining to the assessment year 2011-2012, excluded the two entities TCS E-Serve and Infosys BPO from the list of comparables and consequently were to be excluded for the assessment year 2010-2011.(AY. 2010-11)
Cadence Design Systems (India) v. Dy. CIT [2024] 168 taxmann.com 122 (/ (2025) 482 ITR 415 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Comparables-Transfer Pricing Officer, including high brand value companies-Functional similarity alone not decisive factor-Exclusion of such comparables in subsequent assessment year-Direction to exclude the two comparables.[S.92CA]
Leave a Reply